Literature DB >> 21708438

Effect of microbubble contrast agent during high intensity focused ultrasound ablation on rabbit liver in vivo.

Dong Jin Chung1, Se Hyun Cho, Jae Mun Lee, Seong-Tae Hahn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a microbubble contrast agent (SonoVue) during HIFU ablation of a rabbit liver.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: HIFU ablations (intensity of 400W/cm(2) for 4s, six times, with a 5s interval between exposures) were performed upon 16 in vivo rabbit livers before and after intravenous injection of a microbubble contrast agent (0.8ml). A Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare mean ablation volume and time required to tissue ablation on real-time US. Shape of ablation and pattern of coagulative necrosis were analyzed by Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: The volume of coagulative necrosis was significantly larger in the combination microbubble and HIFU group than in the HIFU alone group (P<0.05). Also, time to reach ablation was shorter in the combination microbubble and HIFU group than in the HIFU alone group (P<0.05). When analyzing the shape of tissue ablation, a pyramidal shape was more prevalently in the HIFU alone group compared to the combination microbubble and HIFU group (P<0.05). Following an analysis of the pattern of coagulative necrosis, non-cavitary necrosis was found in ten and cavitary necrosis in six of the samples in the combination microbubble and HIFU group. Conversely, non-cavitary necrosis occurred in all 16 samples in the HIFU alone group (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: HIFU of in vivo rabbit livers with a microbubble contrast agent produced larger zones of ablation and more cavitary tissue necrosis than without the use of a microbubble contrast agent. Microbubble contrast agents may be useful in tissue ablation by enhancing the treatment effect of HIFU.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21708438     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  18 in total

1.  Nonthermal ablation with microbubble-enhanced focused ultrasound close to the optic tract without affecting nerve function.

Authors:  Nathan McDannold; Yong-Zhi Zhang; Chanikarn Power; Ferenc Jolesz; Natalia Vykhodtseva
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Acceleration of ultrasound thermal therapy by patterned acoustic droplet vaporization.

Authors:  Oliver D Kripfgans; Man Zhang; Mario L Fabiilli; Paul L Carson; Frederic Padilla; Scott D Swanson; Charles Mougenot; J Brian Fowlkes; Charles Mougenot
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Modeling of Microbubble-Enhanced High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound.

Authors:  Aswin Gnanaskandan; Chao-Tsung Hsiao; Georges Chahine
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Enhanced laser surface ablation with an integrated photoacoustic imaging and high intensity focused ultrasound system.

Authors:  David Hazlewood; Xinmai Yang
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.025

5.  Cavitation-enhanced nonthermal ablation in deep brain targets: feasibility in a large animal model.

Authors:  Costas D Arvanitis; Natalia Vykhodtseva; Ferenc Jolesz; Margaret Livingstone; Nathan McDannold
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Using passive cavitation images to classify high-intensity focused ultrasound lesions.

Authors:  Kevin J Haworth; Vasant A Salgaonkar; Nicholas M Corregan; Christy K Holland; T Douglas Mast
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Cavitation-enhanced MR-guided focused ultrasound ablation of rabbit tumors in vivo using phase shift nanoemulsions.

Authors:  Jonathan A Kopechek; Eun-Joo Park; Yong-Zhi Zhang; Natalia I Vykhodtseva; Nathan J McDannold; Tyrone M Porter
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Accumulation of phase-shift nanoemulsions to enhance MR-guided ultrasound-mediated tumor ablation in vivo.

Authors:  Jonathan A Kopechek; Eunjoo Park; Chang-Sheng Mei; Nathan J McDannold; Tyrone M Porter
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.682

9.  Nonthermal ablation in the rat brain using focused ultrasound and an ultrasound contrast agent: long-term effects.

Authors:  Nathan McDannold; Yongzhi Zhang; Natalia Vykhodtseva
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Contrast agent shell properties effects on heat deposition in bubble enhanced high intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Aswin Gnanaskandan; Chao-Tsung Hsiao; Georges Chahine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.