Literature DB >> 16474967

The reasons of general practitioners for promoting colorectal cancer mass screening in France.

Célia Berchi1, Jean-Marc Dupuis, Guy Launoy.   

Abstract

Implementation of colorectal cancer (CRC) mass screening is a public health priority. Obtaining the involvement of general practitioners (GPs) is crucial for ensuring participation by the general public. This study elicited GPs' reasons for promoting CRC screening. The method used was discrete choice modeling. Questionnaires with a set of pairs of hypothetical screening scenarios were sent to 700 GPs. Factors influencing GPs' screening practice were found to be: the effectiveness of the screening program, the proportion of false negatives and false positives, and their remuneration. Hence improving screening test sensitivity and setting up specific remuneration for conducting screening would help to increase GPs' participation in CRC screening in France.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16474967     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-006-0339-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  8 in total

1.  Assessing preferences for improved smoking cessation medications: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Joachim Marti
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-26

2.  Attributes Used for Cancer Screening Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rebekah Hall; Antonieta Medina-Lara; Willie Hamilton; Anne E Spencer
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Knowledge and attitudes of primary health care physicians and nurses with regard to population screening for colorectal cancer in Balearic Islands and Barcelona.

Authors:  Maria Ramos; Magdalena Esteva; Jesús Almeda; Elena Cabeza; Diana Puente; Rosa Saladich; Albert Boada; Maria Llagostera
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  The Effect of Educational Intervention on the Patient's Willingness to Carry out the Immunochemical Faecal Occult Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Rositsa Tsvetanova Dimova; Donka Dimitrova Dimitrova; Rumiana Gencheva Stoyanova; Boriana Angelova Levterova; Nikolay Georgiev Atanasov; Radost Spiridonova Assenova
Journal:  Zdr Varst       Date:  2015-06-09

Review 5.  Stated Preference for Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 1990-2013.

Authors:  Carol Mansfield; Florence K L Tangka; Donatus U Ekwueme; Judith Lee Smith; Gery P Guy; Chunyu Li; A Brett Hauber
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 6.  Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ramzi G Salloum; Elizabeth A Shenkman; Jordan J Louviere; David A Chambers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Patients' and urologists' preferences for prostate cancer treatment: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  E W de Bekker-Grob; M C J Bliemer; B Donkers; M-L Essink-Bot; I J Korfage; M J Roobol; C H Bangma; E W Steyerberg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Clinicians' overestimation of febrile child risk assessment.

Authors:  Evelien deVos-Kerkhof; Damian Roland; Esther de Bekker-Grob; Rianne Oostenbrink; Monica Lakhanpaul; Henriëtte A Moll
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 3.183

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.