Literature DB >> 21704881

The RAD score: a simple acute asthma severity score compares favorably to more complex scores.

Donald H Arnold1, Tebeb Gebretsadik, Thomas J Abramo, Karel G Moons, James R Sheller, Tina V Hartert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute asthma severity scores facilitate assessment and implementation of timely and appropriate therapy for pediatric patients but are complex and challenging for clinicians to use at the bedside.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a simple, bedside acute asthma severity score comprising 3 standard clinical measures performs as well as more comprehensive asthma scores.
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled participants 5 to 17 years of age with acute asthma exacerbations. We recorded 3 asthma scores at baseline and after 2 hours of treatment: the Pediatric Asthma Severity Score (PASS), the Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM), and the RAD score (Respiratory rate; Accessory muscle use; Decreased breath sounds). We assessed each score for criterion validity in predicting baseline percent forced expiratory volume in 1 second (%FEV(1)) and for responsiveness in predicting change of %FEV(1) after 2 hours of treatment using multiple linear regression models adjusted for age, race, sex, and Global Initiative for Asthma chronic control.
RESULTS: Of 536 participants included for analyses, median age was 8.8 years, 60% were male, and 58% were African American. The 3 acute asthma scores demonstrated similar criterion validity to explain variation of baseline %FEV(1) (R(2): 0.434 [PASS]; 0.462 [PRAM]; 0.426 [RAD]), but none demonstrated clinically significant responsiveness to change in %FEV(1) (R(2): 0.109 [PASS]; 0.106 [PRAM]; 0.139 [RAD]).
CONCLUSIONS: The RAD score, comprising 3 routinely measured bedside clinical parameters, is a simple and easily used instrument for assessing the severity of an acute asthma exacerbation and has comparable criterion validity and improved responsiveness when compared with 2 more complex acute asthma scores.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21704881      PMCID: PMC3760486          DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol        ISSN: 1081-1206            Impact factor:   6.347


  23 in total

Review 1.  Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations.

Authors:  J A Husted; R J Cook; V T Farewell; D D Gladman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  The maximal expiratory flow-volume curve. Normal standards, variability, and effects of age.

Authors:  R J Knudson; R C Slatin; M D Lebowitz; B Burrows
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1976-05

3.  A methodological framework for assessing health indices.

Authors:  B Kirshner; G Guyatt
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1985

4.  Reliability of eliciting physical signs in examination of the chest.

Authors:  M A Spiteri; D G Cook; S W Clarke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-04-16       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The Preschool Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM): a responsive index of acute asthma severity.

Authors:  D S Chalut; F M Ducharme; G M Davis
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  Regression models for prognostic prediction: advantages, problems, and suggested solutions.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Matchar; T A Reichert
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985-10

7.  The pulmonary index. Assessment of a clinical score for asthma.

Authors:  A B Becker; N A Nelson; F E Simons
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1984-06

8.  Performance of a novel clinical score, the Pediatric Asthma Severity Score (PASS), in the evaluation of acute asthma.

Authors:  Marc H Gorelick; Molly W Stevens; Theresa R Schultz; Philip V Scribano
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  Standards for the diagnosis and care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, November 1986.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1987-07

Review 10.  Acute severe asthma.

Authors:  E R McFadden
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 21.405

View more
  5 in total

1.  Performance of the Acute Asthma Intensity Research Score (AAIRS) for acute asthma research protocols.

Authors:  Donald H Arnold; Benjamin R Saville; Wenli Wang; Tina V Hartert
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 6.347

Review 2.  ATS Core Curriculum 2017: Part II. Pediatric Pulmonary Medicine.

Authors:  Paul E Moore; Jason T Poston; Debra Boyer; Emily Barsky; Jonathan Gaffin; Kathleen B Boyne; Kristie R Ross; Laura Beth Mann Dosier; Timothy J Vece; Alicia M Casey; Sebastian K Welsh; J Wells Logan; Edward G Shepherd; Pelton A Phinzy; Howard B Panitch; Christina M Papantonakis; Eric D Austin; Amir B Orandi; Maleewan Kitcharoensakkul; Mark K Abe; Amjad Horani; Jordan S Rettig; Jessica Pittman
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2017-08

3.  Direct concurrent comparison of multiple pediatric acute asthma scoring instruments.

Authors:  Michael D Johnson; Flory L Nkoy; Xiaoming Sheng; Tom Greene; Bryan L Stone; Jennifer Garvin
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.515

4.  Pediatric acute asthma scoring systems: a systematic review and survey of UK practice.

Authors:  Jerry Chacko; Charlotte King; David Harkness; Shrouk Messahel; Julie Grice; John Roe; Niall Mullen; Ian P Sinha; Daniel B Hawcutt
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2020-06-02

5.  Clinical Scores for Dyspnoea Severity in Children: A Prospective Validation Study.

Authors:  Hendriekje Eggink; Paul Brand; Roelien Reimink; Jolita Bekhof
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.