Literature DB >> 21697168

Modelling human balance using switched systems with linear feedback control.

Piotr Kowalczyk1, Paul Glendinning, Martin Brown, Gustavo Medrano-Cerda, Houman Dallali, Jonathan Shapiro.   

Abstract

We are interested in understanding the mechanisms behind and the character of the sway motion of healthy human subjects during quiet standing. We assume that a human body can be modelled as a single-link inverted pendulum, and the balance is achieved using linear feedback control. Using these assumptions, we derive a switched model which we then investigate. Stable periodic motions (limit cycles) about an upright position are found. The existence of these limit cycles is studied as a function of system parameters. The exploration of the parameter space leads to the detection of multi-stability and homoclinic bifurcations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21697168      PMCID: PMC3243384          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  27 in total

1.  Simplifying the complexities of maintaining balance.

Authors:  Robert J Peterka
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

2.  Sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Controlling human upright posture: velocity information is more accurate than position or acceleration.

Authors:  John Jeka; Tim Kiemel; Robert Creath; Fay Horak; Robert Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The frequency of human, manual adjustments in balancing an inverted pendulum is constrained by intrinsic physiological factors.

Authors:  Ian D Loram; Peter J Gawthrop; Martin Lakie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Bounded stability of the quiet standing posture: an intermittent control model.

Authors:  Alessandra Bottaro; Youko Yasutake; Taishin Nomura; Maura Casadio; Pietro Morasso
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Visual control of stable and unstable loads: what is the feedback delay and extent of linear time-invariant control?

Authors:  Ian D Loram; Martin Lakie; Peter J Gawthrop
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Importance of body sway velocity information in controlling ankle extensor activities during quiet stance.

Authors:  Kei Masani; Milos R Popovic; Kimitaka Nakazawa; Motoki Kouzaki; Daichi Nozaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Feedforward ankle strategy of balance during quiet stance in adults.

Authors:  P Gatev; S Thomas; T Kepple; M Hallett
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Dynamic regulation of sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  Robert J Peterka; Patrick J Loughlin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Balancing with vibration: a prelude for "drift and act" balance control.

Authors:  John G Milton; Toru Ohira; Juan Luis Cabrera; Ryan M Fraiser; Janelle B Gyorffy; Ferrin K Ruiz; Meredith A Strauss; Elizabeth C Balch; Pedro J Marin; Jeffrey L Alexander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Balancing on tightropes and slacklines.

Authors:  P Paoletti; L Mahadevan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Acceleration feedback improves balancing against reflex delay.

Authors:  Tamás Insperger; John Milton; Gábor Stépán
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Control at stability's edge minimizes energetic costs: expert stick balancing.

Authors:  John Milton; Ryan Meyer; Max Zhvanetsky; Sarah Ridge; Tamás Insperger
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Saturation limits the contribution of acceleration feedback to balancing against reaction delay.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Gabor Stepan; Tamas Insperger
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Response to perturbation during quiet standing resembles delayed state feedback optimized for performance and robustness.

Authors:  Ambrus Zelei; John Milton; Gabor Stepan; Tamas Insperger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Intermittent control models of human standing: similarities and differences.

Authors:  Peter Gawthrop; Ian Loram; Henrik Gollee; Martin Lakie
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Smooth enlargement of human standing sway by instability due to weak reaction floor and noise.

Authors:  Tetsuro Funato; Shinya Aoi; Nozomi Tomita; Kazuo Tsuchiya
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Learning an intermittent control strategy for postural balancing using an EMG-based human-computer interface.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Asai; Shota Tateyama; Taishin Nomura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Generation of the Human Biped Stance by a Neural Controller Able to Compensate Neurological Time Delay.

Authors:  Ping Jiang; Ryosuke Chiba; Kaoru Takakusaki; Jun Ota
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Postural control during quiet bipedal standing in rats.

Authors:  Tetsuro Funato; Yota Sato; Soichiro Fujiki; Yamato Sato; Shinya Aoi; Kazuo Tsuchiya; Dai Yanagihara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.