Literature DB >> 29386400

Saturation limits the contribution of acceleration feedback to balancing against reaction delay.

Li Zhang1, Gabor Stepan2, Tamas Insperger2,3.   

Abstract

A nonlinear model for human balancing subjected to a saturated delayed proportional-derivative-acceleration (PDA) feedback is analysed. Compared to the proportional-derivative (PD) controller, it is confirmed that the PDA controller improves local stability even for large feedback delays. However, it is shown that the saturated PDA controller typically introduces subcritical Hopf bifurcation into the system, which can also lead to falling for large enough perturbations. The subcriticality becomes stronger as the acceleration feedback gain increases or the saturation torque limit decreases. These explain some features of human balancing failure related to the increased reaction delay of inactive elderly people.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hopf bifurcation; acceleration feedback; human balancing; reaction delay; saturation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29386400      PMCID: PMC5805977          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  28 in total

1.  Simplifying the complexities of maintaining balance.

Authors:  Robert J Peterka
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

2.  On-off intermittency in a human balancing task.

Authors:  Juan L Cabrera; John G Milton
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2002-09-20       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Evidence for strong synaptic coupling between single tactile afferents from the sole of the foot and motoneurons supplying leg muscles.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Leah R Bent; Penelope A McNulty; Vaughan G Macefield
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neural-mechanical feedback control scheme generates physiological ankle torque fluctuation during quiet stance.

Authors:  Albert H Vette; Kei Masani; Kimitaka Nakazawa; Milos R Popovic
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Stability in a frontal plane model of balance requires coupled changes to postural configuration and neural feedback control.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Bingham; Julia T Choi; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Control at stability's edge minimizes energetic costs: expert stick balancing.

Authors:  John Milton; Ryan Meyer; Max Zhvanetsky; Sarah Ridge; Tamás Insperger
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Stability radius as a method for comparing the dynamics of neuromechanical systems.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Bingham; Lena H Ting
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 8.  A two-joint human posture control model with realistic neural delays.

Authors:  Yao Li; William S Levine; Gerald E Loeb
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Visual prediction: psychophysics and neurophysiology of compensation for time delays.

Authors:  Romi Nijhawan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.579

10.  Visual reliance for balance control in older adults persists when visual information is disrupted by artificial feedback delays.

Authors:  Ting Ting Yeh; Tyler Cluff; Ramesh Balasubramaniam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Rolling balance board of adjustable geometry as a tool to assess balancing skill and to estimate reaction time delay.

Authors:  Csenge A Molnar; Ambrus Zelei; Tamas Insperger
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Response to perturbation during quiet standing resembles delayed state feedback optimized for performance and robustness.

Authors:  Ambrus Zelei; John Milton; Gabor Stepan; Tamas Insperger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.