Literature DB >> 21696204

Using free energy of binding calculations to improve the accuracy of virtual screening predictions.

Robert D Malmstrom1, Stanley J Watowich.   

Abstract

Virtual screening of small molecule databases against macromolecular targets was used to identify binding ligands and predict their lowest energy bound conformation (i.e., pose). AutoDock4-generated poses were rescored using mean-field pathway decoupling free energy of binding calculations and evaluated if these calculations improved virtual screening discrimination between bound and nonbound ligands. Two small molecule databases were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the rescoring algorithm in correctly identifying binders of L99A T4 lysozyme. Self-dock calculations of a database containing compounds with known binding free energies and cocrystal structures largely reproduced experimental measurements, although the mean difference between calculated and experimental binding free energies increased as the predicted bound poses diverged from the experimental poses. In addition, free energy rescoring was more accurate than AutoDock4 scores in discriminating between known binders and nonbinders, suggesting free energy rescoring could be a useful approach to reduce false positive predictions in virtual screening experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21696204      PMCID: PMC3145410          DOI: 10.1021/ci200126v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  51 in total

1.  EUDOC: a computer program for identification of drug interaction sites in macromolecules and drug leads from chemical databases.

Authors:  Yuan-Ping Pang; Emanuele Perola; Kun Xu; Franklyn G. Prendergast
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2001-11-30       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Comparative study of several algorithms for flexible ligand docking.

Authors:  Badry D Bursulaya; Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Wei Wang; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 2.518

6.  Predicting absolute ligand binding free energies to a simple model site.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Alan P Graves; John D Chodera; Andrea C McReynolds; Brian K Shoichet; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative.

Authors:  Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  Specificity of ligand binding in a buried nonpolar cavity of T4 lysozyme: linkage of dynamics and structural plasticity.

Authors:  A Morton; B W Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-07-11       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Energetic origins of specificity of ligand binding in an interior nonpolar cavity of T4 lysozyme.

Authors:  A Morton; W A Baase; B W Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-07-11       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 10.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

View more
  7 in total

1.  Perspective: Alchemical free energy calculations for drug discovery.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Pavel V Klimovich
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Application of binding free energy calculations to prediction of binding modes and affinities of MDM2 and MDMX inhibitors.

Authors:  Hui Sun Lee; Sunhwan Jo; Hyun-Suk Lim; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 3.  Structure-based virtual screening for drug discovery: principles, applications and recent advances.

Authors:  Evanthia Lionta; George Spyrou; Demetrios K Vassilatis; Zoe Cournia
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Current progress in Structure-Based Rational Drug Design marks a new mindset in drug discovery.

Authors:  Valère Lounnas; Tina Ritschel; Jan Kelder; Ross McGuire; Robert P Bywater; Nicolas Foloppe
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 7.271

5.  The anti-inflammatory potential of cefazolin as common gamma chain cytokine inhibitor.

Authors:  Barbara Żyżyńska-Granica; Bartosz Trzaskowski; Małgorzata Dutkiewicz; Oliwia Zegrocka-Stendel; Maja Machcińska; Katarzyna Bocian; Magdalena Kowalewska; Katarzyna Koziak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Cloud infrastructures for in silico drug discovery: economic and practical aspects.

Authors:  Daniele D'Agostino; Andrea Clematis; Alfonso Quarati; Daniele Cesini; Federica Chiappori; Luciano Milanesi; Ivan Merelli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  PIP3-binding proteins promote age-dependent protein aggregation and limit survival in C. elegans.

Authors:  Srinivas Ayyadevara; Meenakshisundaram Balasubramaniam; Jay Johnson; Ramani Alla; Samuel G Mackintosh; Robert J Shmookler Reis
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.