Literature DB >> 22731511

Application of binding free energy calculations to prediction of binding modes and affinities of MDM2 and MDMX inhibitors.

Hui Sun Lee1, Sunhwan Jo, Hyun-Suk Lim, Wonpil Im.   

Abstract

Molecular docking is widely used to obtain binding modes and binding affinities of a molecule to a given target protein. Despite considerable efforts, however, prediction of both properties by docking remains challenging mainly due to protein's structural flexibility and inaccuracy of scoring functions. Here, an integrated approach has been developed to improve the accuracy of binding mode and affinity prediction and tested for small molecule MDM2 and MDMX antagonists. In this approach, initial candidate models selected from docking are subjected to equilibration MD simulations to further filter the models. Free energy perturbation molecular dynamics (FEP/MD) simulations are then applied to the filtered ligand models to enhance the ability in predicting the near-native ligand conformation. The calculated binding free energies for MDM2 complexes are overestimated compared to experimental measurements mainly due to the difficulties in sampling highly flexible apo-MDM2. Nonetheless, the FEP/MD binding free energy calculations are more promising for discriminating binders from nonbinders than docking scores. In particular, the comparison between the MDM2 and MDMX results suggests that apo-MDMX has lower flexibility than apo-MDM2. In addition, the FEP/MD calculations provide detailed information on the different energetic contributions to ligand binding, leading to a better understanding of the sensitivity and specificity of protein-ligand interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22731511      PMCID: PMC3480999          DOI: 10.1021/ci3000997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  47 in total

1.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  CHARMM-GUI: a web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM.

Authors:  Sunhwan Jo; Taehoon Kim; Vidyashankara G Iyer; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 3.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Structure of the human Mdmx protein bound to the p53 tumor suppressor transactivation domain.

Authors:  Grzegorz M Popowicz; Anna Czarna; Tad A Holak
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  High affinity interaction of the p53 peptide-analogue with human Mdm2 and Mdmx.

Authors:  Anna Czarna; Grzegorz M Popowicz; Aleksandra Pecak; Siglinde Wolf; Grzegorz Dubin; Tad A Holak
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  Challenges and advances in computational docking: 2009 in review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Yuriev; Mark Agostino; Paul A Ramsland
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.137

7.  The p53 inhibitors MDM2/MDMX complex is required for control of p53 activity in vivo.

Authors:  Lei Huang; Zheng Yan; Xiaodong Liao; Yuan Li; Jie Yang; Zhu-Gang Wang; Yong Zuo; Hidehiko Kawai; Miriam Shadfan; Suthakar Ganapathy; Zhi-Min Yuan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Differential binding of p53 and nutlin to MDM2 and MDMX: computational studies.

Authors:  Thomas Leonard Joseph; Arumugam Madhumalar; Christopher J Brown; David P Lane; Chandra S Verma
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 9.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Garrett M Morris; Ruth Huey; William Lindstrom; Michel F Sanner; Richard K Belew; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.376

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  CHARMM-GUI PDB manipulator for advanced modeling and simulations of proteins containing nonstandard residues.

Authors:  Sunhwan Jo; Xi Cheng; Shahidul M Islam; Lei Huang; Huan Rui; Allen Zhu; Hui Sun Lee; Yifei Qi; Wei Han; Kenno Vanommeslaeghe; Alexander D MacKerell; Benoît Roux; Wonpil Im
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 3.507

2.  Targeted Proteomic Approaches for Proteome-Wide Characterizations of the AMP-Binding Capacities of Kinases.

Authors:  Weili Miao; Jiekai Yin; Douglas F Porter; Xiaogang Jiang; Paul A Khavari; Yinsheng Wang
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 5.370

3.  Molecular docking of DS-3032B, a mouse double minute 2 enzyme antagonist with potential for oncology treatment development.

Authors:  Vítor Hugo Sales da Mota; Fabrício Freire de Melo; Breno Bittencourt de Brito; Filipe Antônio França da Silva; Kádima Nayara Teixeira
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-06-24

4.  CHARMM-GUI Ligand Binder for absolute binding free energy calculations and its application.

Authors:  Sunhwan Jo; Wei Jiang; Hui Sun Lee; Benoît Roux; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Improving Protein-Ligand Docking Results with High-Throughput Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Hugo Guterres; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations for Highly Flexible Protein MDM2 and Its Inhibitors.

Authors:  Nidhi Singh; Wenjin Li
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Molecular Docking: Shifting Paradigms in Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Luca Pinzi; Giulio Rastelli
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Spectroscopic and Molecular Docking Investigation on the Noncovalent Interaction of Lysozyme with Saffron Constituent "Safranal".

Authors:  Mohd Sajid Ali; Hamad A Al-Lohedan
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-04-16

9.  Potential Therapeutic Targets of Rehmannia Formulations on Diabetic Nephropathy: A Comparative Network Pharmacology Analysis.

Authors:  Kam Wa Chan; Kam Yan Yu; Wai Han Yiu; Rui Xue; Sarah Wing-Yan Lok; Hongyu Li; Yixin Zou; Jinyuan Ma; Kar Neng Lai; Sydney Chi-Wai Tang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Predicting Diagnostic Potential of Cathepsin in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Design Validated by Computational, Biophysical and Electrochemical Data.

Authors:  Hemangi Ranade; Priya Paliwal; Anis Ahmad Chaudhary; Sakshi Piplani; Hassan Ahmed Rudayni; Mohammed Al-Zharani; Ravi Ranjan Niraj; Manali Datta
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-12-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.