Literature DB >> 21692003

New design bioprosthesis: early outcome of Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna in the small annular aortic position.

Eiki Tayama1, Yukihiro Tomita, Kazuyoshi Takagi, Tomokazu Kosuga, Hideki Teshima, Ken-ichi Imasaka, Hiromich Sonoda.   

Abstract

The Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT (CEP) Magna (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) is a newly developed bioprosthesis with an improved cuff design that allows its implantation into the smaller aortic annulus. We evaluated the hemodynamic performance of the CEP Magna for smaller aortic annulus cases. Patients who underwent aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis receiving a Magna 19 mm (n = 13), were compared with a standard CEP (n = 19). In the 19-mm series, the real annular size was significantly smaller in the Magna than the standard (21.1 ± 0.8 vs. 19.8 ± 0.8 mm, p = 0.007). The Magna was significantly superior with respect to effective orifice area index (EOAI) at postoperative 3 months; however, no significant difference was seen in other factors (peak pressure gradient, left ventricular mass index, ejection fraction). At postoperative 3 months, despite the lack of statistical significance, the incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) was lower with the Magna. Using the same label size, the Magna can be implanted in a smaller aortic annulus with performance comparable with or better than hemodynamic performance with the standard CEP. The Magna is a useful prosthesis for the small aortic annular patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21692003     DOI: 10.1007/s10047-011-0579-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Artif Organs        ISSN: 1434-7229            Impact factor:   1.731


  11 in total

1.  Are stentless valves hemodynamically superior to stented valves? A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Gideon Cohen; George T Christakis; Campbell D Joyner; Christopher D Morgan; Miguel Tamariz; Naoji Hanayama; Hari Mallidi; J P Szalai; Marko Katic; Vivek Rao; Stephen E Fremes; Bernard S Goldman
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  The Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna aortic xenograft: a new design with an improved hemodynamic performance.

Authors:  María José Dalmau; José Maríagonzález-Santos; Javier López-Rodríguez; Maria Bueno; Antonio Arribas
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-02-20

3.  Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.

Authors:  Ina M Wagner; Walter B Eichinger; Sabine Bleiziffer; Florian Botzenhardt; Isabel Gebauer; Ralf Guenzinger; Robert Bauernschmitt; Ruediger Lange
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Left ventricular mass regression early after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  G T Christakis; C D Joyner; C D Morgan; S E Fremes; K J Buth; J Y Sever; V Rao; K P Panagiotopoulos; P M Murphy; B S Goldman
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Hypoplasia of the aortic root. The problem of aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  R Nicks; T Cartmill; L Bernstein
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Factors associated with periprosthetic leakage following primary mitral valve replacement: with special consideration of the suture technique.

Authors:  J P Dhasmana; E H Blackstone; J W Kirklin; N T Kouchoukos
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Evaluation of suture techniques for mitral valve replacement.

Authors:  J R Newton; D D Glower; J W Davis; J S Rankin
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Patch enlargement of the aortic and mitral valve rings with aortic and mitral double valve replacement. Experimental study.

Authors:  S Manouguian; N Abu-Aishah; J Neitzel
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Hemodynamic performance and incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch of the complete supraannular perimount magna bioprosthesis in the aortic position.

Authors:  F Botzenhardt; W B Eichinger; R Guenzinger; S Bleiziffer; I Wagner; R Bauernschmitt; R Lange
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 10.  The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch.

Authors:  S H Rahimtoola
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Artificial Organs 2011: the year in review.

Authors:  Y Sawa; E Tatsumi; A Funakubo; T Horiuchi; K Iwasaki; A Kishida; T Masuzawa; K Matsuda; A Myoui; M Nishimura; T Nishimura; S Tokunaga; Y Tomizawa; T Tomo; T Tsukiya; T Yamaoka
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 2.  Prosthetic cardiac valves: history and review of cardiac prostheses clinically available in Japan.

Authors:  Eiki Tayama; Kosuke Saku; Tomoyuki Anegawa; Atsunobu Oryoji; Shinya Negoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Late clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valves.

Authors:  Hyoung Woo Chang; Wook Sung Kim; Joong Hyun Ahn; Keumhee C Carriere; Dong Seop Jeong; Yang Hyun Cho; Kiick Sung; Pyo Won Park
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.