Literature DB >> 17467435

Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.

Ina M Wagner1, Walter B Eichinger, Sabine Bleiziffer, Florian Botzenhardt, Isabel Gebauer, Ralf Guenzinger, Robert Bauernschmitt, Ruediger Lange.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Aortic valve replacement in patients with a small aortic annulus is often associated with increased pressure gradients. For this reason, prostheses for completely supra-annular placement have been developed. To evaluate the potential benefit of this design, the present study compared the effectiveness of 1 intra-supra-annular bioprosthesis and 3 completely supra-annular bioprostheses in patients with an aortic annulus diameter of 23 mm or less.
METHODS: Between August 2000 and December 2004, each of 192 patients requiring aortic valve replacement with an intraoperatively measured aortic annulus diameter of 23 mm or less received one of the following bioprostheses: the stented bovine Sorin Soprano bioprosthesis (n = 28) (Sorin Group, Saluggia, Italy), the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis (n = 50) (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, Calif), the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna bioprosthesis (n = 70) (Edwards Lifesciences), or the stented porcine Medtronic Mosaic (n = 44) (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) bioprosthesis. After 6 months, hemodynamic data at rest and during exercise were obtained by echocardiography in 142 patients.
RESULTS: The pericardial valves showed lower mean systolic pressure gradients, larger effective orifice areas and indices, and superior effective orifice fractions than did the porcine valve (P < .05) (Carpentier-Edwards Perimount: 10.9 +/- 3.6 mm Hg, 1.59 +/- 0.41 cm2, 0.9 +/- 0.25 cm2/m2, 41.9% +/- 9.6%; Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna 10.1 +/- 3.8 mm Hg, 1.64 +/- 0.38 cm2, 0.93 +/- 0.22 cm2/m2, 45.1% +/- 10.2%; Sorin Soprano 13.5 +/- 5.0 mm Hg, 1.64 +/- 0.32 cm2, 0.92 +/- 0.15 cm2/m2, 45.8% +/- 9.0%; vs Medtronic Mosaic 15.5 +/- 5.2 mm Hg, 1.31 +/- 0.42 cm2, 0.75 +/- 0.24 cm2/m2, 35.2% +/- 10.0%, respectively). The lowest mean systolic pressure gradients were found after the implantation of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna. Effective orifice areas, indices, and fractions of the pericardial valves did not show significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with small aortic roots, transvalvular gradients and effective orifice area showed a tendency to superior results in pericardial valves compared with the porcine bioprosthesis. However, the completely supra-annular design does not necessarily lead to superior hemodynamic results compared with the intra-supra-annular position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17467435     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.10.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  9 in total

1.  Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement using Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT bioprosthesis series in elderly patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Naritomo Nishioka; Akira Yamada; Kosuke Ujihira; Yutaka Iba; Ryushi Maruyama; Eiichiro Hatta; Yoshihiko Kurimoto; Katsuhiko Nakanishi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-08-04

2.  New design bioprosthesis: early outcome of Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna in the small annular aortic position.

Authors:  Eiki Tayama; Yukihiro Tomita; Kazuyoshi Takagi; Tomokazu Kosuga; Hideki Teshima; Ken-ichi Imasaka; Hiromich Sonoda
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  The clinical anatomy and pathology of the human arterial valves: implications for repair or replacement.

Authors:  Michael G Bateman; Alexander J Hill; Jason L Quill; Paul A Iaizzo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Impact of obesity on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement with a small prosthesis.

Authors:  Biao Wang; Hongyang Yang; Tao Wang; Xiquan Zhang; Wenjie Zhu; Guangqing Cao; Shuming Wu
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-03-25

Review 5.  Aortic valve replacement: is porcine or bovine valve better?

Authors:  Kok Hooi Yap; Ralph Murphy; Mohan Devbhandari; Rajamiyer Venkateswaran
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-12-04

6.  Aortic valve replacement with the Cardioprotese Premium bovine pericardium bioprosthesis: four-year clinical results.

Authors:  Fábio Rocha Farias; Francisco Diniz Affonso da Costa; Eduardo Mendel Balbi Filho; Daniele de Fátima Fornazari; Claudinei Collatusso; Andreia Dumsch de Aragon Ferreira; Sergio Veiga Lopes; Tadeu Augusto Fernandes
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-05-15

7.  Late clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valves.

Authors:  Hyoung Woo Chang; Wook Sung Kim; Joong Hyun Ahn; Keumhee C Carriere; Dong Seop Jeong; Yang Hyun Cho; Kiick Sung; Pyo Won Park
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Obesity and the risk of late mortality after aortic valve replacement with small prosthesis.

Authors:  Biao Wang; Hongyang Yang; Shuming Wu; Guangqing Cao; Hongling Yang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 1.637

9.  Significant intra-valvular pressure loss across EPIC SUPRA and perimount magna supra-annular designed aortic bioprostheses in patients with normal aortic size.

Authors:  Jagdish C Mohan; Vishwas Mohan; Madhu Shukla; Arvind Sethi
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2016-06-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.