Literature DB >> 21691926

Trial-by-trial adjustments of top-down set modulate oculomotor capture.

Jeff Moher1, Jared Abrams, Howard E Egeth, Steven Yantis, Veit Stuphorn.   

Abstract

The role of top-down control in visual search has been a subject of much debate. Recent research has focused on whether attentional and oculomotor capture by irrelevant salient distractors can be modulated through top-down control, and if so, whether top-down control can be rapidly initiated based on current task goals. In the present study, participants searched for a unique shape in an array containing otherwise homogeneous shapes. A cue prior to each trial indicated the probability that an irrelevant color singleton distractor would appear on that trial. Initial saccades were less likely to land on the target and participants took longer to initiate a saccade to the target when a color distractor was present than when it was absent; this cost was greatly reduced on trials in which the probability that a distractor would appear was high, as compared to when the probability was low. These results suggest that top-down control can modulate oculomotor capture in visual search, even in a singleton search task in which distractors are known to readily capture both attention and the eyes. Furthermore, the results show that top-down distractor suppression mechanisms can be initiated quickly in anticipation of irrelevant salient distractors and can be adjusted on a trial-by-trial basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21691926      PMCID: PMC3605975          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0118-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  21 in total

1.  Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control.

Authors:  J Theeuwes; A F Kramer; S Hahn; D E Irwin; G J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control.

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr; Edward Awh; Paul Laurey
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Item-specific control of automatic processes: stroop process dissociations.

Authors:  Larry L Jacoby; D Stephen Lindsay; Sandra Hessels
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

4.  Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control.

Authors:  John G Kerns; Jonathan D Cohen; Angus W MacDonald; Raymond Y Cho; V Andrew Stenger; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-02-13       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Rethinking the role of automaticity in cognitive control.

Authors:  Chris Blais; Michael B Harris; Jennifer V Guerrero; Silvia A Bunge
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

7.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J E Hoffman; B Subramaniam
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08

10.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  W F Bacon; H E Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-05
View more
  16 in total

1.  The effects of task difficulty on visual search strategy in virtual 3D displays.

Authors:  Marc Pomplun; Tyler W Garaas; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  Abandoning and modifying one action plan for alternatives.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The influence of motivational salience on saccade latencies.

Authors:  Marcus Rothkirch; Florian Ostendorf; Anne-Lene Sax; Philipp Sterzer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Top-down knowledge modulates onset capture in a feedforward manner.

Authors:  Stefanie I Becker; Amanda J Lewis; Jenna E Axtens
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

6.  Isoeccentric locations are not equivalent: the extent of the vertical meridian asymmetry.

Authors:  Jared Abrams; Aaron Nizam; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Dissociable effects of salience on attention and goal-directed action.

Authors:  Jeff Moher; Brian A Anderson; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Reconciling conflicting electrophysiological findings on the guidance of attention by working memory.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Target selection biases from recent experience transfer across effectors.

Authors:  Jeff Moher; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Evidence for second-order singleton suppression based on probabilistic expectations.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Mary Kosoyan; Joy J Geng
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.