Literature DB >> 23283417

The influence of motivational salience on saccade latencies.

Marcus Rothkirch1, Florian Ostendorf, Anne-Lene Sax, Philipp Sterzer.   

Abstract

Eye movements provide a direct link to study the allocation of overt attention to stimuli in the visual field. The initiation of saccades towards visual stimuli is known to be influenced by the bottom-up salience of stimuli as well as the motivational context of the task. Here, we asked whether the initiation of saccades is also influenced by the intrinsic motivational salience of a stimulus. Face stimuli were first associated with positive or negative motivational salience through instrumental learning. The same faces served as target stimuli in a subsequent saccade task, in which their motivational salience was no longer task-relevant. Participants performed either voluntary saccades, which required the selection of the saccade target out of two simultaneously presented stimuli (experiment 1), or reactive saccades, where only the target stimulus was presented (experiment 2). We found a specific effect of learned positive stimulus value on the latencies of voluntary saccades: For faces with high versus low positive motivational salience, saccadic latencies were significantly reduced. No such difference was observed for previously punished faces. In contrast, reactive saccades to both previously rewarded and punished faces were unaffected by learned stimulus value. Our findings show for the first time that saccadic preparation is susceptible to the acquired intrinsic motivational salience of visual stimuli. Based on the observation that only voluntary saccades but not reactive saccades were modulated, we conclude that the recruitment of neural processes for target identification is required to allow for an influence of motivational stimulus salience on saccadic preparation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23283417     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3284-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  74 in total

1.  Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control.

Authors:  J Theeuwes; A F Kramer; S Hahn; D E Irwin; G J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Matching behavior and the representation of value in the parietal cortex.

Authors:  Leo P Sugrue; Greg S Corrado; William T Newsome
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Awareness of the saccade goal in oculomotor selection: your eyes go before you know.

Authors:  Wieske van Zoest; Mieke Donk
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2010-04-24

4.  The urgency to look: prompt saccades to the benefit of perception.

Authors:  Anna Montagnini; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  The representation of information about faces in the temporal and frontal lobes.

Authors:  Edmund T Rolls
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 6.  From thought to action: the parietal cortex as a bridge between perception, action, and cognition.

Authors:  Jacqueline Gottlieb
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Saccade preparation signals in the human frontal and parietal cortices.

Authors:  Clayton E Curtis; Jason D Connolly
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The time course of attentional and oculomotor capture reveals a common cause.

Authors:  Amelia R Hunt; Adrian von Mühlenen; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Human prosaccades and antisaccades under risk: effects of penalties and rewards on visual selection and the value of actions.

Authors:  M Ross; L J Lanyon; J Viswanathan; D S Manoach; J J S Barton
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Emotional scene content drives the saccade generation system reflexively.

Authors:  Lauri Nummenmaa; Jukka Hyönä; Manuel G Calvo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  6 in total

1.  Saccade latency indexes exogenous and endogenous object-based attention.

Authors:  Gözde Şentürk; Adam S Greenberg; Taosheng Liu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Gaze interaction: anticipation-based control of the gaze of others.

Authors:  Eva Riechelmann; Tim Raettig; Anne Böckler; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-10-25

3.  Memory Performance for Everyday Motivational and Neutral Objects Is Dissociable from Attention.

Authors:  Judith Schomaker; Bianca C Wittmann
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.558

4.  Influence of reward learning on visual attention and eye movements in a naturalistic environment: A virtual reality study.

Authors:  Alexia Bourgeois; Emmanuel Badier; Naem Baron; Fabien Carruzzo; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Chemogenetic inactivation reveals the inhibitory control function of the prefronto-striatal pathway in the macaque brain.

Authors:  Mineki Oguchi; Shingo Tanaka; Xiaochuan Pan; Takefumi Kikusui; Keiko Moriya-Ito; Shigeki Kato; Kazuto Kobayashi; Masamichi Sakagami
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-09-16

6.  Reward-priming of location in visual search.

Authors:  Clayton Hickey; Leonardo Chelazzi; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.