Literature DB >> 21689317

Prospective randomized multicentre study comparing stapler haemorrhoidopexy with Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoid dearterialization for third-degree haemorrhoids.

A Infantino1, D F Altomare, C Bottini, M Bonanno, S Mancini, T Yalti, P Giamundo, J Hoch, A El Gaddal, C Pagano.   

Abstract

AIM: Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoid dearterialization (THD) and stapler haemorrhoidopexy (SH) have been demonstrated to be less painful than the Milligan-Morgan procedure. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of THD vs SH in the treatment of third-degree haemorrhoids in an equivalent trial.
METHOD: One hundred and sixty-nine patients with third-degree haemorrhoids were randomized online to receive THD (n = 85) or SH (n = 84) in 10 Colorectal Units in which the staff were well trained in both techniques. The mean follow-up period was 17 (range 15-20) months.
RESULTS: Early minor postoperative complications occurred in 30.6% of patients in the THD group and in 32.1% of patients in the SH group. Milder spontaneous pain and pain on defecation were reported in the THD group in the first postoperative week, but this was not statistically significant. Late complications were significantly higher (P = 0.028) in the SH group. Residual haemorrhoids persisted in 12 patients in the THD group and in six patients in the SH group (P = 0.14). Six patients in the SH group and 10 in the THD group underwent further treatment of haemorrhoids (P = 0.34). No differences were found in postoperative incontinence. The obstructed defecation score (ODS) was significantly higher in the SH group (P < 0.02). Improvement in quality of life was similar in both groups. Postoperative in-hospital stay was 1.14 days in the THD group and 1.31 days in the SH group (P = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: Both THD and SH techniques are effective for the treatment of third-degree haemorrhoids in the medium term. THD has a better cost-effective ratio and lower (not significant) pain compared with SH. Postoperative pain and recurrence did not differ significantly between the two groups.
© 2011 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2011 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21689317     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02628.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  33 in total

Review 1.  Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: is it time to move on?

Authors:  E H Aly
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Comparison of the early results of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization and hemorrhoidectomy using an ultrasonic scalpel.

Authors:  Akira Tsunoda; Yoshiyuki Kiyasu; Wataru Fujii; Nobuyasu Kano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Haemorrhoids.

Authors:  George E Reese; Alexander C von Roon; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-01-29

4.  Rectoanal repair versus suture haemorrhoidopexy: a comparative study on suture mucopexy procedures for high-grade haemorrhoids.

Authors:  G E Theodoropoulos; N V Michalopoulos; D Linardoutsos; P Stamopoulos; I Flessas; D Tsamis; G C Zografos
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Conservative and surgical treatment of haemorrhoids.

Authors:  Donato F Altomare; Simona Giuratrabocchetta
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  Doppler-Guided Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization (DG-THD) Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy (SH) in the Treatment of Third-Degree Hemorrhoids: Clinical Results at Short and Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  S Leardi; B Pessia; M Mascio; F Piccione; M Schietroma; R Pietroletti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  A prospective randomized trial of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus ultrasonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids.

Authors:  A Tsunoda; T Takahashi; H Kusanagi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Transanal anopexy with HemorPex System (HPS) is effective in treating grade II and III hemorrhoids: medium-term follow-up.

Authors:  M Basile; V Di Resta; E Ranieri
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Evaluation of the effectiveness and patients' contentment with transanal haemorrhoidal artery dearterialisation and mucopexy (THD) for treatment of haemorrhoidal disease: a 6-year study.

Authors:  Qurat Ul Ain; Yasir Bashir; Emmanuel Eguare
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation with mucopexy versus stapler haemorrhoidopexy: a randomised trial with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  P Lucarelli; M Picchio; M Caporossi; F De Angelis; A Di Filippo; F Stipa; E Spaziani
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.