Literature DB >> 26274539

Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: is it time to move on?

E H Aly1.   

Abstract

Stapled haemorrhoidectomy was proposed as an 'ideal' solution for symptomatic haemorrhoids, with minimal postoperative pain, no perianal wound requiring postoperative wound care and a relatively short operative time. Some randomised controlled trials and reviews confirmed these findings, claiming that stapled haemorrhoidopexy is the most effective and safe procedure for haemorrhoids. However, there are increasing number of publications highlighting that the technique is associated with serious and life threatening complications. Maybe it is now the time to accept that stapled haemorrhoidopexy has done its role in directing our attention to the fact that modern surgical treatment of haemorrhoids should avoid excision of anorectal skin but should instead aim at treatment intervention above the dentate line.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Outcome; Stapled haemorrhoidopexy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26274539      PMCID: PMC5210130          DOI: 10.1308/003588415X14181254789123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  23 in total

1.  Obliteration of the rectal lumen after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: report of a case.

Authors:  Pasquale Giordano; Benjamin M Bradley; Lashan Peiris
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Histopathology of stapled haemorrhoidectomy specimens: a cautionary note.

Authors:  B D George; D Shetty; I Lindsey; N J Mc C Mortensen; B F Warren
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  "First do no harm" revisited.

Authors:  Daniel K Sokol
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-10-25

4.  Serious unconventional complications of surgery with stapler for haemorrhoidal prolapse and obstructed defaecation because of rectocoele and rectal intussusception.

Authors:  G Naldini
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Prospective randomized multicentre study comparing stapler haemorrhoidopexy with Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoid dearterialization for third-degree haemorrhoids.

Authors:  A Infantino; D F Altomare; C Bottini; M Bonanno; S Mancini; T Yalti; P Giamundo; J Hoch; A El Gaddal; C Pagano
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  M J Cheetham; N J Mortensen; P O Nystrom; M A Kamm; R K Phillips
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a prospective study with a 6-year follow-up.

Authors:  A Ommer; Jakob Hinrichs; Horst Möllenberg; Babji Marla; Martin Karl Walz
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Pasquale Giordano; Gianpiero Gravante; Roberto Sorge; Lauren Ovens; Piero Nastro
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-03

Review 9.  Continence disorders after anal surgery--a relevant problem?

Authors:  A Ommer; F A Wenger; T Rolfs; M K Walz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Impact of stapled haemorrhoidopexy on stool continence and anorectal function: long-term follow-up of 242 patients.

Authors:  Stefan Riss; Philipp Riss; Michael Schuster; Thomas Riss
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 3.445

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sclerobanding (Combined Rubber Band Ligation with 3% Polidocanol Foam Sclerotherapy) for the Treatment of Second- and Third-Degree Hemorrhoidal Disease: Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Francesco Pata; Luigi Maria Bracchitta; Giancarlo D'Ambrosio; Salvatore Bracchitta
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 4.241

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.