Literature DB >> 2168852

Comparison of in vitro and in vivo activities associated with the G6PD allozyme polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.

W F Eanes1, L Katona, M Longtine.   

Abstract

Earlier studies of the A and B allozymes at the G6pd locus show a differential ability of the genotypes to suppress the loss of viability associated with a low activity 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase mutation, 6Pgdlo1. This observation indicates a relatively lower activity for the A allozyme genotype, but it is not known if this level of suppression required a large difference in in vivo activity. To clarify this difference an analysis of the biochemical properties of the purified allozymes was carried out, as well as an analysis of the activity level associated with an original low activity P element-derived allele which had partially reverted and lost its suppression ability. G6PD activity and protein level were studied in 47 X chromosome lines from North America. The A genotype averages a 9% lower Vmax. From analysis of the correlation between G6PD activity and protein level it remains unclear whether the allozyme Vmax difference results from dissimilarity in protein level or kcat. At 25 degrees and physiological pH, comparative studies of the steady-state kinetics show the two purified allozyme variants differ significantly in their KM values for glucose-6-phosphate and NADP, and the K1 for NADPH. In aggregate these parameters predict the A genotype possesses a 20% lower in vitro catalytic efficiency. A partial revertant of a P element-derived low activity B variant, was shown to lose the ability to suppress 6Pgdlo1 low viability after acquiring only 60% of normal B activity. This last comparison shows the A genotype activity must be reduced in vivo by at least 40%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2168852      PMCID: PMC1204110     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  26 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of X chromosome effects on the activities of the glucose 6-phosphate and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenases of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  N Miyashita; C C Laurie-Ahlberg; A N Wilton; T H Emigh
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Purification and molecular weight determination of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and malic enzyme from mouse and Drosophila.

Authors:  C Y Lee; C H Langley; J Burkhart
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1978-06-01       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Homozygous and Hemizygous Viability Variation on the X Chromosome of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  W F Eanes; J Hey; D Houle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Role of the pentose phosphate pathway in metabolism of Drosophila melanogaster elucidated by mutations affecting glucose 6-phosphate and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenases.

Authors:  V A Gvozdev; T I Gerasimova; G L Kogan
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1976-04-15       Impact factor: 4.124

5.  Molecular genetics of the achaete-scute gene complex of D. melanogaster.

Authors:  S Campuzano; L Carramolino; C V Cabrera; M Ruíz-Gómez; R Villares; A Boronat; J Modolell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Maintenance of an aminopeptidase allele frequency cline by natural selection.

Authors:  R K Koehn; R I Newell; F Immermann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  GLUCOSE-6-PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE IN DROSOPHILA: X-LINKED ELECTROPHORETIC VARIANTS.

Authors:  W J YOUNG; J E PORTER; B CHILDS
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-01-10       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Investigations on the organization of genetic loci in Drosophila melanogaster: lethal mutations affecting 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase and their suppression.

Authors:  V A Gvozdev; T I Gerasimova; G L Kogan; J M Rosovsky
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1977-06-08

9.  Evidence for biochemical and physiological differences between enzyme genotypes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D R Cavener; M T Clegg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Biochemical differences between products of the Adh locus in Drosophila.

Authors:  J F McDonald; S M Anderson; M Santos
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Experimental approaches to evaluate the contributions of candidate protein-coding mutations to phenotypic evolution.

Authors:  Jay F Storz; Anthony J Zera
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

2.  Amino acid polymorphism and rare electrophoretic variants of G6PD from natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  W F Eanes; M Kirchner; D R Taub; J Yoon; J T Chen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Polymorphic human prostaglandin H synthase-2 proteins and their interactions with cyclooxygenase substrates and inhibitors.

Authors:  W Liu; E M Poole; C M Ulrich; R J Kulmacz
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.550

4.  Historical selection, amino acid polymorphism and lineage-specific divergence at the G6pd locus in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  W F Eanes; M Kirchner; J Yoon; C H Biermann; I N Wang; M A McCartney; B C Verrelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Single-locus latitudinal clines and their relationship to temperate adaptation in metabolic genes and derived alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Efe Sezgin; David D Duvernell; Luciano M Matzkin; Yihao Duan; Chen-Tseh Zhu; Brian C Verrelli; Walter F Eanes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Evidence for adaptive evolution of the G6pd gene in the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans lineages.

Authors:  W F Eanes; M Kirchner; J Yoon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Direct measurement of in vivo flux differences between electrophoretic variants of G6PD from Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Labate; W F Eanes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Systemic properties of metabolic networks lead to an epistasis-based model for heterosis.

Authors:  Julie B Fiévet; Christine Dillmann; Dominique de Vienne
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Quantifying interactions within the NADP(H) enzyme network in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Thomas J S Merritt; Caitlin Kuczynski; Efe Sezgin; Chen-Tseh Zhu; Seiji Kumagai; Walter F Eanes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 4.562

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.