Literature DB >> 14603539

Imaging in cervical cancer.

Michele Follen1, Charles F Levenback, Revathy B Iyer, Perry W Grigsby, Erik A Boss, Ebrahim S Delpassand, Bruno D Fornage, Elliot K Fishman.   

Abstract

Cervical cancer traditionally has been staged clinically. Advances in imaging could improve the staging of cervical cancer by facilitating the detection of lymph node metastases and micrometastases in distant organs. Such progress could lead to improvements in treatment selection and therefore increase overall survival rates. At the Second International Conference on Clinical Cancer (Houston, TX, April 11-14, 2002), a panel composed of gynecologic oncologists, radiation oncologists, and diagnostic radiologists reviewed relevant technologies. Advances in lymphangiography, ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), and lymphatic mapping were reviewed, along with the impact of these advances on the diagnosis, treatment, and survival of patients with cervical cancer. Few cancer centers still use lymphangiography, but the sensitivity of this method ranges from 28% to 83%, with specificity ranging from 47% to 100%. The roles of transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography in evaluating cervical cancer are expected to expand when new contrast agents increase the sensitivity of these techniques to parametrial invasion and lymph node metastases; meanwhile, ultrasonography's most significant contributions may involve the identification of uterine and cervical leiomyomas and the evaluation of urinary tract obstruction. Advances in CT have made it a rival technique to MRI, but limitations prevent CT from providing definitive information on certain parameters. MRI, which is valuable because of its superior soft tissue contrast resolution, multiplanar capabilities, and cost-effectiveness, is used to determine the size of the cervix and to detect certain types of invasion, characteristics of lymph nodes, and the presence of disease in the ureter, lung, and liver. PET with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose has been found to detect abnormal lymph node regions better than CT does but PET can also be used in conjunction with CT to measure tumor dimensions. PET also has become a method for identifying tumors that are unresponsive to chemoradiation. When used together with immunohistochemical and molecular techniques as well as conventional stains, sentinel lymph node mapping, an important development in the surgical management of solid tumors, is expected to improve gynecologic cancer management. Advances in imaging methods and in contrast agents, along with advances in the combined use of the two, are expected to make imaging technologies more valuable in cervical cancer assessment. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14603539     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  20 in total

Review 1.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Juan Luis Alcázar; Sara Arribas; José Angel Mínguez; Matías Jurado
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-10-08

2.  A novel dynamic field-matching technique for treatment of patients with para-aortic node-positive cervical cancer: Clinical experience.

Authors:  Craig Baden; Alexander Whitley; Javier López-Araujo; Richard Popple; Jun Duan; Robert Kim
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-11-21

3.  Differentiating metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes in cervical cancer patients using monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  Qingxia Wu; Dandan Zheng; Ligang Shi; Mingbo Liu; Meiyun Wang; Dapeng Shi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Progress in the Study of Lymph Node Metastasis in Early-stage Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Bang-Xing Huang; Fang Fang
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-08-20

5.  Contribution of mono-exponential, bi-exponential and stretched exponential model-based diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis and differentiation of uterine cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Meng Lin; Xiaoduo Yu; Yan Chen; Han Ouyang; Bing Wu; Dandan Zheng; Chunwu Zhou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Photoacoustic imaging of the uterine cervix to assess collagen and water content changes in murine pregnancy.

Authors:  Yan Yan; Nardhy Gomez-Lopez; Maryam Basij; Amin Vossoughi Shahvari; Felipe Vadillo-Ortega; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero; Mohammad MehrMohammadi
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  [18F]FDG-PET/CT and MRI for initial pelvic lymph node staging in patients with cervical carcinoma: The potential usefulness of [18F]FDG-PET/MRI.

Authors:  Philip Anner; Marius Mayerhöfer; Wolfgang Wadsak; Silvana Geleff; Robert Dudczak; Alexander Haug; Marcus Hacker; Georgios Karanikas
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 8.  [Uterine cervical cancer : preoperative staging with magnetic resonance imaging].

Authors:  F Collettini; B Hamm
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer after inclusion of PET/CT in staging procedures.

Authors:  Henrik Villibald Hansen; Annika Loft; Anne Kiil Berthelsen; Ib Jarle Christensen; Claus Høgdall; Svend Aage Engelholm
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Early invasive cervical cancer: MRI and CT predictors of lymphatic metastases in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 intergroup study.

Authors:  Donald G Mitchell; Bradley Snyder; Fergus Coakley; Caroline Reinhold; Gillian Thomas; Marco A Amendola; Lawrence H Schwartz; Paula Woodward; Harpreet Pannu; Mostafa Atri; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.