BACKGROUND: The National Quality Forum (NQF) identified hospice services as a national priority area for health care quality improvement and endorsed a set of preferred practices for quality palliative and hospice care. This study reports the first national data regarding hospices' self-reported implementation of the NQF preferred practices and identifies hospice characteristics associated with more comprehensive implementation. METHODS: We conducted a national cross-sectional survey of a random sample of hospices (n=591; response rate, 84%) from September 2008 to November 2009. We evaluated the reported implementation of NQF preferred practices in the care of both patients and families. RESULTS: The range of reported implementation of individual NQF preferred practices among hospices was 45% to 97%. Twenty-one percent of hospices reported having implemented all patient-centered preferred practices, 26% all family-centered preferred practices, and 10% all patient and family-centered preferred practices. In adjusted analyses, large hospices (100 or more patients per day) were significantly more likely than small hospices (<20 patients per day) to report having implemented all patient-centered preferred practices [odds ratio (OR)=2.46; 95% CI, 1.24, 4.90] and all family-centered preferred practices (OR=1.88; 95% CI, 1.02, 3.45). Similarly, chain-affiliated hospices were significantly more likely than free-standing hospices to report having implemented all patient-centered preferred practices (OR=2.45; 95% CI, 1.23, 4.87) and all family-centered preferred practices (OR=1.85; 95% CI, 1.01, 3.41). CONCLUSIONS: Hospices' reported implementation of individual preferred practices for palliative and hospice care quality was high; however, reported comprehensive implementation of preferred practices was rare and may be difficult to achieve for small, free-standing hospices.
BACKGROUND: The National Quality Forum (NQF) identified hospice services as a national priority area for health care quality improvement and endorsed a set of preferred practices for quality palliative and hospice care. This study reports the first national data regarding hospices' self-reported implementation of the NQF preferred practices and identifies hospice characteristics associated with more comprehensive implementation. METHODS: We conducted a national cross-sectional survey of a random sample of hospices (n=591; response rate, 84%) from September 2008 to November 2009. We evaluated the reported implementation of NQF preferred practices in the care of both patients and families. RESULTS: The range of reported implementation of individual NQF preferred practices among hospices was 45% to 97%. Twenty-one percent of hospices reported having implemented all patient-centered preferred practices, 26% all family-centered preferred practices, and 10% all patient and family-centered preferred practices. In adjusted analyses, large hospices (100 or more patients per day) were significantly more likely than small hospices (<20 patients per day) to report having implemented all patient-centered preferred practices [odds ratio (OR)=2.46; 95% CI, 1.24, 4.90] and all family-centered preferred practices (OR=1.88; 95% CI, 1.02, 3.45). Similarly, chain-affiliated hospices were significantly more likely than free-standing hospices to report having implemented all patient-centered preferred practices (OR=2.45; 95% CI, 1.23, 4.87) and all family-centered preferred practices (OR=1.85; 95% CI, 1.01, 3.41). CONCLUSIONS: Hospices' reported implementation of individual preferred practices for palliative and hospice care quality was high; however, reported comprehensive implementation of preferred practices was rare and may be difficult to achieve for small, free-standing hospices.
Authors: Melissa D A Carlson; Jeph Herrin; Qingling Du; Andrew J Epstein; Emily Cherlin; R Sean Morrison; Elizabeth H Bradley Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2009-07-27 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Maureen E Canavan; Melissa D Aldridge Carlson; Heather L Sipsma; Elizabeth H Bradley Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Melissa D Aldridge; Mark Schlesinger; Colleen L Barry; R Sean Morrison; Ruth McCorkle; Rosemary Hürzeler; Elizabeth H Bradley Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Melissa D Aldridge; Andrew J Epstein; Abraham A Brody; Eric J Lee; R Sean Morrison; Elizabeth H Bradley Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Aleksandra S Dain; Elizabeth H Bradley; Rosemary Hurzeler; Melissa D Aldridge Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2014-12-30 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Melissa D Aldridge Carlson; Colleen L Barry; Emily J Cherlin; Ruth McCorkle; Elizabeth H Bradley Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Melissa D Aldridge; Andrew J Epstein; Abraham A Brody; Eric J Lee; Emily Cherlin; Elizabeth H Bradley Journal: Med Care Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 2.983