OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there is racial variation in hospice enrollees in rates of hospitalization and hospice disenrollment and, if so, whether systematic differences in hospice provider patterns explain the variation. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Hospice. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare beneficiaries (N = 145,038) enrolled in a national random sample of hospices (N = 577) from the National Hospice Survey and followed until death (2009-10). MEASUREMENTS: We used Medicare claims data to identify hospital admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospice disenrollment after hospice enrollment. We used a series of hierarchical models including hospice-level random effects to compare outcomes of blacks and whites. RESULTS: In unadjusted models, black hospice enrollees were significantly more likely than white enrollees to be admitted to the hospital (14.9% vs 8.7%, odds ratio (OR) = 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.74-1.95), visit the ED (19.8% vs 13.5%, OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.50-1.66), and disenroll from hospice (18.1% vs 13.0%, OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.40-1.56). These results were largely unchanged after accounting for participant clinical and demographic covariates and hospice-level random effects. In adjusted models, blacks were at higher risk of hospital admission (OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.64-1.86), ED visits (OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.52-1.70), and hospice disenrollment (OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.45-1.63). CONCLUSION: Racial differences in intensity of care at the end of life are not attributable to hospice-level variation in intensity of care. Differences in patterns of care between black and white hospice enrollees persist within the same hospice.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there is racial variation in hospice enrollees in rates of hospitalization and hospice disenrollment and, if so, whether systematic differences in hospice provider patterns explain the variation. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Hospice. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare beneficiaries (N = 145,038) enrolled in a national random sample of hospices (N = 577) from the National Hospice Survey and followed until death (2009-10). MEASUREMENTS: We used Medicare claims data to identify hospital admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospice disenrollment after hospice enrollment. We used a series of hierarchical models including hospice-level random effects to compare outcomes of blacks and whites. RESULTS: In unadjusted models, black hospice enrollees were significantly more likely than white enrollees to be admitted to the hospital (14.9% vs 8.7%, odds ratio (OR) = 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.74-1.95), visit the ED (19.8% vs 13.5%, OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.50-1.66), and disenroll from hospice (18.1% vs 13.0%, OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.40-1.56). These results were largely unchanged after accounting for participant clinical and demographic covariates and hospice-level random effects. In adjusted models, blacks were at higher risk of hospital admission (OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.64-1.86), ED visits (OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.52-1.70), and hospice disenrollment (OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.45-1.63). CONCLUSION: Racial differences in intensity of care at the end of life are not attributable to hospice-level variation in intensity of care. Differences in patterns of care between black and white hospice enrollees persist within the same hospice.
Authors: Amber E Barnato; Zekarias Berhane; Lisa A Weissfeld; Chung-Chou H Chang; Walter T Linde-Zwirble; Derek C Angus Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Melissa D A Carlson; Jeph Herrin; Qingling Du; Andrew J Epstein; Emily Cherlin; R Sean Morrison; Elizabeth H Bradley Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2009-07-27 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Melissa D Aldridge; Andrew J Epstein; Abraham A Brody; Eric J Lee; Emily Cherlin; Elizabeth H Bradley Journal: Med Care Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Veerawat Phongtankuel; Benjamin A Scherban; Manney C Reid; Amanda Finley; Angela Martin; Jeanne Dennis; Ronald D Adelman Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Lauren T Starr; Connie M Ulrich; Paul Junker; Scott M Appel; Nina R O'Connor; Salimah H Meghani Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2020-05-23 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Elizabeth A Luth; David J Russell; Abraham A Brody; Ritchell Dignam; Sara J Czaja; Miriam Ryvicker; Kathryn H Bowles; Holly G Prigerson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Zhimeng Jia; Richard E Leiter; Justin J Sanders; Donald R Sullivan; Pedro Gozalo; Jennifer N Bunker; Joan M Teno Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 5.128