Literature DB >> 21685443

The effects of induced state negative affect on performance monitoring processes.

Peter E Clayson1, Ann Clawson, Michael J Larson.   

Abstract

Previous research suggests that performance-monitoring processes are related to personality traits; relationships with affective states, however, remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to replicate and extend previous findings that induced state negative affect alters electrophysiological reflections of performance monitoring. High-density event-related potentials (ERPs) were obtained from 69 healthy individuals (41 female, 28 male) who completed an Eriksen flanker task and received either encouraging or derogatory feedback based on mean reaction times (RTs) for 30-trial sub-blocks. Affective state, behavioral measures (i.e. error rates, RTs) and ERP measures [i.e. error-related negativity (ERN), post-error positivity (Pe) and N2] were assessed. Reaction times did not differ between feedback groups. Participants who received derogatory feedback committed more errors over time. Despite changes in affect, no significant group differences were demonstrated for behavioral or ERP measures of performance monitoring. Increases in vigilance were associated with more negative N2 amplitudes; no other changes in affective state were associated with changes in ERP measures. Results are consistent with findings suggesting performance-monitoring processes are only slightly affected by changes in affective state and fail to replicate previous studies suggesting the ERN is related to state changes in affect-supporting the possibility of the ERN as an endophenotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21685443      PMCID: PMC3427863          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsr040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  60 in total

1.  On the ERN and the significance of errors.

Authors:  Greg Hajcak; Jason S Moser; Nick Yeung; Robert F Simons
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Error-related psychophysiology and negative affect.

Authors:  Greg Hajcak; Nicole McDonald; Robert F Simons
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  The effects of fear on performance monitoring and attentional allocation.

Authors:  Jason S Moser; Greg Hajcak; Robert F Simons
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Error-related ERP components and individual differences in punishment and reward sensitivity.

Authors:  Maarten A S Boksem; Mattie Tops; Anne E Wester; Theo F Meijman; Monicque M Lorist
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Task engagement and the relationships between the error-related negativity, agreeableness, behavioral shame proneness and cortisol.

Authors:  Mattie Tops; Maarten A S Boksem; Anne E Wester; Monicque M Lorist; Theo F Meijman
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 4.905

6.  Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks.

Authors:  M Falkenstein; J Hohnsbein; J Hoormann; L Blanke
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-06

7.  The impact of cognitive deficits on conflict monitoring. Predictable dissociations between the error-related negativity and N2.

Authors:  Nick Yeung; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-02

8.  Affective context-induced modulation of the error-related negativity.

Authors:  Michael J Larson; William M Perlstein; David Stigge-Kaufman; Kiesa G Kelly; Vonetta M Dotson
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2006-02-27       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 9.  Alcohol myopia. Its prized and dangerous effects.

Authors:  C M Steele; R A Josephs
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1990-08

10.  Impairment of error monitoring following sleep deprivation.

Authors:  Ling-Ling Tsai; Hung-Yu Young; Shulan Hsieh; Chia-Shun Lee
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.849

View more
  12 in total

1.  Neural responses to negative feedback are related to negative emotionality in healthy adults.

Authors:  Diane L Santesso; Ryan Bogdan; Jeffrey L Birk; Elena L Goetz; Avram J Holmes; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Electrophysiological Endophenotypes and the Error-Related Negativity (ERN) in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Family Study.

Authors:  Ann Clawson; Mikle South; Scott A Baldwin; Michael J Larson
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2017-05

3.  Error monitoring is related to processing internal affective states.

Authors:  Martin E Maier; Cristina Scarpazza; Francesca Starita; Roberto Filogamo; Elisabetta Làdavas
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 4.  Aversiveness of errors and the error-related negativity (ERN): A systematic review on the affective states' manipulations findings.

Authors:  Xiomara Nuñez-Estupiñan; Lucas Zanatta Berticelli; Rosa Maria Martins de Almeida; Gustavo Gauer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.526

5.  The acute effects of MDMA and ethanol administration on electrophysiological correlates of performance monitoring in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  D B Spronk; G J H Dumont; R J Verkes; E R A De Bruijn
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Gender Role, But Not Sex, Shapes Humans' Susceptibility to Emotion.

Authors:  Jiajin Yuan; Hong Li; Quanshan Long; Jiemin Yang; Tatia M C Lee; Dandan Zhang
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 5.203

7.  Feelings of helplessness increase ERN amplitudes in healthy individuals.

Authors:  D M Pfabigan; N M Pintzinger; D R Siedek; C Lamm; B Derntl; U Sailer
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  The impact of a brief mindfulness meditation intervention on cognitive control and error-related performance monitoring.

Authors:  Michael J Larson; Patrick R Steffen; Mark Primosch
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Performance monitoring and the medial prefrontal cortex: a review of individual differences and context effects as a window on self-regulation.

Authors:  Stefon J R van Noordt; Sidney J Segalowitz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Suppression (but not reappraisal) impairs subsequent error detection: an ERP study of emotion regulation's resource-depleting effect.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Lixia Yang; Yan Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.