BACKGROUND: The sperm chromatin of fertile men retains a small number of nucleosomes that are enriched at developmental gene promoters and imprinted gene loci. This unique chromatin packaging at certain gene promoters provides these genomic loci the ability to convey instructive epigenetic information to the zygote, potentially expanding the role and significance of the sperm epigenome in embryogenesis. We hypothesize that changes in chromatin packaging may be associated with poor reproductive outcome. METHODS: Seven patients with reproductive dysfunction were recruited: three had unexplained poor embryogenesis during IVF and four were diagnosed with male infertility and previously shown to have altered protamination. Genome-wide analysis of the location of histones and histone modifications was analyzed by isolation and purification of DNA bound to histones and protamines. The histone-bound fraction of DNA was analyzed using high-throughput sequencing, both initially and following chromatin immunoprecipitation. The protamine-bound fraction was hybridized to agilent arrays. DNA methylation was examined using bisulfite sequencing. RESULTS: Unlike fertile men, five of seven infertile men had non-programmatic (randomly distributed) histone retention genome-wide. Interestingly, in contrast to the total histone pool, the localization of H3 Lysine 4 methylation (H3K4me) or H3 Lysine 27 methylation (H3K27me) was highly similar in the gametes of infertile men compared with fertile men. However, there was a reduction in the amount of H3K4me or H3K27me retained at developmental transcription factors and certain imprinted genes. Finally, the methylation status of candidate developmental promoters and imprinted loci were altered in a subset of the infertile men. CONCLUSIONS: This initial genome-wide analysis of epigenetic markings in the sperm of infertile men demonstrates differences in composition and epigenetic markings compared with fertile men, especially at certain imprinted and developmental loci. Although no single locus displays a complete change in chromatin packaging or DNA modification, the data suggest that moderate changes throughout the genome exist and may have a cumulative detrimental effect on fecundity.
BACKGROUND: The sperm chromatin of fertile men retains a small number of nucleosomes that are enriched at developmental gene promoters and imprinted gene loci. This unique chromatin packaging at certain gene promoters provides these genomic loci the ability to convey instructive epigenetic information to the zygote, potentially expanding the role and significance of the sperm epigenome in embryogenesis. We hypothesize that changes in chromatin packaging may be associated with poor reproductive outcome. METHODS: Seven patients with reproductive dysfunction were recruited: three had unexplained poor embryogenesis during IVF and four were diagnosed with male infertility and previously shown to have altered protamination. Genome-wide analysis of the location of histones and histone modifications was analyzed by isolation and purification of DNA bound to histones and protamines. The histone-bound fraction of DNA was analyzed using high-throughput sequencing, both initially and following chromatin immunoprecipitation. The protamine-bound fraction was hybridized to agilent arrays. DNA methylation was examined using bisulfite sequencing. RESULTS: Unlike fertile men, five of seven infertile men had non-programmatic (randomly distributed) histone retention genome-wide. Interestingly, in contrast to the total histone pool, the localization of H3 Lysine 4 methylation (H3K4me) or H3 Lysine 27 methylation (H3K27me) was highly similar in the gametes of infertile men compared with fertile men. However, there was a reduction in the amount of H3K4me or H3K27me retained at developmental transcription factors and certain imprinted genes. Finally, the methylation status of candidate developmental promoters and imprinted loci were altered in a subset of the infertile men. CONCLUSIONS: This initial genome-wide analysis of epigenetic markings in the sperm of infertile men demonstrates differences in composition and epigenetic markings compared with fertile men, especially at certain imprinted and developmental loci. Although no single locus displays a complete change in chromatin packaging or DNA modification, the data suggest that moderate changes throughout the genome exist and may have a cumulative detrimental effect on fecundity.
Authors: Mellissa R W Mann; Susan S Lee; Adam S Doherty; Raluca I Verona; Leisha D Nolen; Richard M Schultz; Marisa S Bartolomei Journal: Development Date: 2004-07-07 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: O El-Maarri; K Buiting; E G Peery; P M Kroisel; B Balaban; K Wagner; B Urman; J Heyd; C Lich; C I Brannan; J Walter; B Horsthemke Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Gerald F Cox; Joachim Bürger; Va Lip; Ulrike A Mau; Karl Sperling; Bai-Lin Wu; Bernhard Horsthemke Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2002-05-08 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Florenza A La Spina; Marina Romanato; Santiago Brugo-Olmedo; Sabrina De Vincentiis; Vanina Julianelli; Rocio M Rivera; Mariano G Buffone Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Meritxell Jodar; Edward Sendler; Sergey I Moskovtsev; Clifford L Librach; Robert Goodrich; Sonja Swanson; Russ Hauser; Michael P Diamond; Stephen A Krawetz Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Christian De Geyter; Ursula Gobrecht-Keller; Astrid Ahler; Manuel Fischer Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: J Richard Pilsner; Alex Shershebnev; Yulia A Medvedeva; Alexander Suvorov; Haotian Wu; Andrey Goltsov; Evgeny Loukianov; Tatiana Andreeva; Fedor Gusev; Andrey Manakhov; Luidmila Smigulina; Maria Logacheva; Victoria Shtratnikova; Irina Kuznetsova; Peter Speranskiy-Podobed; Jane S Burns; Paige L Williams; Susan Korrick; Mary M Lee; Evgeny Rogaev; Russ Hauser; Oleg Sergeyev Journal: Reprod Toxicol Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 3.143