OBJECTIVE: Previous studies suggest that learning a DNA-test-result has no direct impact on the medical-decisions and psychological well-being of counselees. Their perception, especially their recollections and interpretations of their cancer-risks and heredity, predict and/or mediate this impact. These studies were criticized for their small range of predictors, mediators, outcomes and contextual factors. We studied the short-term impact of DNA-testing with an extended model. METHODS: Three months after disclosure of BRCA1/2-test-results, we sent counselees a questionnaire about their perception, medical and psychological outcomes, and medical, familial and psychological contexts. 248 affected women participated; 30 had received pathogenic-mutations, 16 unclassified-variants and 202 uninformative-results. RESULTS: The actually communicated genetic-information and the contextual variables predicted the counselees' perception, but did not directly predict any outcomes. The counselees' perception predicted and/or completely mediated the counselees' medical intentions and behavior, physical and psychological life-changes, stigma, mastery, negativity and cancer-worries. Short-term distress was related to the perception not only of their own risks, but also of their relatives' risks and heredity-likelihood. Effect sizes were medium to large. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The outcomes of DNA-testing were better predicted by the counselees' perception than by the actually given genetic-information. We recommend genetic-counselors to have tailored, interactive dialogues about the counselees' perception.
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies suggest that learning a DNA-test-result has no direct impact on the medical-decisions and psychological well-being of counselees. Their perception, especially their recollections and interpretations of their cancer-risks and heredity, predict and/or mediate this impact. These studies were criticized for their small range of predictors, mediators, outcomes and contextual factors. We studied the short-term impact of DNA-testing with an extended model. METHODS: Three months after disclosure of BRCA1/2-test-results, we sent counselees a questionnaire about their perception, medical and psychological outcomes, and medical, familial and psychological contexts. 248 affected women participated; 30 had received pathogenic-mutations, 16 unclassified-variants and 202 uninformative-results. RESULTS: The actually communicated genetic-information and the contextual variables predicted the counselees' perception, but did not directly predict any outcomes. The counselees' perception predicted and/or completely mediated the counselees' medical intentions and behavior, physical and psychological life-changes, stigma, mastery, negativity and cancer-worries. Short-term distress was related to the perception not only of their own risks, but also of their relatives' risks and heredity-likelihood. Effect sizes were medium to large. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The outcomes of DNA-testing were better predicted by the counselees' perception than by the actually given genetic-information. We recommend genetic-counselors to have tailored, interactive dialogues about the counselees' perception.
Authors: Teresa L Deshields; Amylou C Dueck; Kerry Rogers; Jennifer R Brown; Tait Shanafelt; David Mintzer; John C Byrd Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2019-03-27
Authors: Eveline M A Bleiker; Mary Jane Esplen; Bettina Meiser; Helle Vendel Petersen; Andrea Farkas Patenaude Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Georgina L Fenton; Amelia K Smit; Lucinda Freeman; Caro Badcock; Kate Dunlop; Phyllis N Butow; Judy Kirk; Anne E Cust Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2017-12-03 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Kathleen F Mittendorf; Tia L Kauffman; Laura M Amendola; Katherine P Anderson; Barbara B Biesecker; Michael O Dorschner; Devan M Duenas; Donna J Eubanks; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Marian J Gilmore; Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Galen Joseph; Stephanie A Kraft; Sandra Soo Jin Lee; Michael C Leo; Elizabeth G Liles; Nangel M Lindberg; Kristin R Muessig; Sonia Okuyama; Kathryn M Porter; Leslie S Riddle; Bradley A Rolf; Alan F Rope; Jamilyn M Zepp; Gail P Jarvik; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 2.261
Authors: A Brédart; J L Kop; A Depauw; O Caron; S Sultan; D Leblond; A Fajac; B Buecher; M Gauthier-Villars; C Noguès; C Flahault; D Stoppa-Lyonnet; S Dolbeault Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 7.640