Literature DB >> 33984519

Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM): A clinical trial assessing a multimodal cancer genetics services delivery program and its impact on diverse populations.

Kathleen F Mittendorf1, Tia L Kauffman2, Laura M Amendola3, Katherine P Anderson4, Barbara B Biesecker5, Michael O Dorschner3, Devan M Duenas6, Donna J Eubanks7, Heather Spencer Feigelson8, Marian J Gilmore9, Jessica Ezzell Hunter9, Galen Joseph10, Stephanie A Kraft11, Sandra Soo Jin Lee12, Michael C Leo7, Elizabeth G Liles7, Nangel M Lindberg7, Kristin R Muessig9, Sonia Okuyama4, Kathryn M Porter6, Leslie S Riddle10, Bradley A Rolf3, Alan F Rope13, Jamilyn M Zepp9, Gail P Jarvik3, Benjamin S Wilfond11, Katrina A B Goddard9.   

Abstract

Advances in the application of genomic technologies in clinical care have the potential to increase existing healthcare disparities. Studies have consistently shown that only a fraction of eligible patients with a family history of cancer receive recommended cancer genetic counseling and subsequent genetic testing. Care delivery models using pre-test and post-test counseling are not scalable, which contributes to barriers in accessing genetics services. These barriers are even more pronounced for patients in historically underserved populations. We have designed a multimodal intervention to improve subsequent cancer surveillance, by improving the identification of patients at risk for familial cancer syndromes, reducing barriers to genetic counseling/testing, and increasing patient understanding of complex genetic results. We are evaluating this intervention in two large, integrated healthcare systems that serve diverse patient populations (NCT03426878). The primary outcome is the number of diagnostic (hereditary cancer syndrome) findings. We are examining the clinical and personal utility of streamlined pathways to genetic testing using electronic medical record data, surveys, and qualitative interviews. We will assess downstream care utilization of individuals receiving usual clinical care vs. genetic testing through the study. We will evaluate the impacts of a literacy-focused genetic counseling approach versus usual care genetic counseling on care utilization and participant understanding, satisfaction, and family communication. By recruiting participants belonging to historically underserved populations, this study is uniquely positioned to evaluate the potential of a novel genetics care delivery program to reduce care disparities.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Family history; Genetic counseling; Genetics; Hereditary cancer; Underserved populations

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33984519      PMCID: PMC8336568          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.261


  67 in total

1.  Confidence of primary care physicians in their ability to carry out basic medical genetic tasks-a European survey in five countries-Part 1.

Authors:  Irmgard Nippert; Hilary J Harris; Claire Julian-Reynier; Ulf Kristoffersson; Leo P Ten Kate; Elizabeth Anionwu; Caroline Benjamin; Kirsty Challen; Jörg Schmidtke; R Peter Nippert; Rodney Harris
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2010-12-04

2.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Educating underserved Latino communities about family health history using lay health advisors.

Authors:  K A Kaphingst; C R Lachance; A Gepp; L Hoyt D'Anna; B Rios-Ellis
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Kathy Charmaz Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Sage 224 £19.99 0761973532 0761973532 [Formula: see text].

Authors: 
Journal:  Nurse Res       Date:  2006-07-01

5.  Defining personal utility in genomics: A Delphi study.

Authors:  J N Kohler; E Turbitt; K L Lewis; B S Wilfond; L Jamal; H L Peay; L G Biesecker; B B Biesecker
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 6.  The genetic prediction of risk for gynecologic cancers.

Authors:  Leslie M Randall; Bhavana Pothuri
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Automatic Genetic Risk Assessment Calculation Using Breast Cancer Family History Data from the EHR compared to Self-Report.

Authors:  Margaret Sin; Julia E McGuinness; Meghna S Trivedi; Alejandro Vanegas; Thomas B Silverman; Katherine D Crew; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

8.  Differences in Family Health History Knowledge Among Bisexual and Lesbian Women.

Authors:  Megan C Roberts; Melinda Krakow; Christopher W Wheldon; Michelle I Silver
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.151

9.  Validation of Version 3.0 of the Breast Cancer Genetics Referral Screening Tool (B-RST™).

Authors:  Cecelia Bellcross; April Hermstad; Christine Tallo; Christine Stanislaw
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Revised guidelines for the clinical management of Lynch syndrome (HNPCC): recommendations by a group of European experts.

Authors:  Hans F A Vasen; Ignacio Blanco; Katja Aktan-Collan; Jessica P Gopie; Angel Alonso; Stefan Aretz; Inge Bernstein; Lucio Bertario; John Burn; Gabriel Capella; Chrystelle Colas; Christoph Engel; Ian M Frayling; Maurizio Genuardi; Karl Heinimann; Frederik J Hes; Shirley V Hodgson; John A Karagiannis; Fiona Lalloo; Annika Lindblom; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Pal Møller; Torben Myrhoj; Fokko M Nagengast; Yann Parc; Maurizio Ponz de Leon; Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo; Julian R Sampson; Astrid Stormorken; Rolf H Sijmons; Sabine Tejpar; Huw J W Thomas; Nils Rahner; Juul T Wijnen; Heikki Juhani Järvinen; Gabriela Möslein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  3 in total

1.  Motivations and concerns of patients considering participation in an implementation study of a hereditary cancer risk assessment program in diverse primary care settings.

Authors:  Devan M Duenas; Kelly J Shipman; Kathryn M Porter; Elizabeth Shuster; Claudia Guerra; Ana Reyes; Tia L Kauffman; Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Katrina A B Goddard; Benjamin S Wilfond; Stephanie A Kraft
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 8.822

2.  ORCA, a values-based decision aid for selecting additional findings from genomic sequencing in adults: Efficacy results from a randomized trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Liles; Michael C Leo; Amanda S Freed; Kathryn M Porter; Jamilyn M Zepp; Tia L Kauffman; Erin Keast; Carmit K McMullen; Inga Gruß; Barbara B Biesecker; Kristin R Muessig; Donna J Eubanks; Laura M Amendola; Michael O Dorschner; Bradley A Rolf; Gail P Jarvik; Katrina A B Goddard; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 8.864

3.  Literacy-adapted, electronic family history assessment for genetics referral in primary care: patient user insights from qualitative interviews.

Authors:  Kathleen F Mittendorf; Hannah S Lewis; Devan M Duenas; Donna J Eubanks; Marian J Gilmore; Katrina A B Goddard; Galen Joseph; Tia L Kauffman; Stephanie A Kraft; Nangel M Lindberg; Ana A Reyes; Elizabeth Shuster; Sapna Syngal; Chinedu Ukaegbu; Jamilyn M Zepp; Benjamin S Wilfond; Kathryn M Porter
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 2.164

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.