Literature DB >> 21684150

Strategy and success for the directed evolution of enzymes.

Paul A Dalby1.   

Abstract

Directed evolution is widely used to improve enzymes, particularly for industrial biocatalytic processes. Molecular biology advances present many new strategies for directed evolution. Commonly used techniques have led to many successful examples of enzyme improvement, yet there is still a need to improve both the efficiency and capability of directed evolution. Recent strategies aimed at making directed evolution faster and more efficient take better advantage of available structural and sequence information. The underlying principles that lead to early dead-ends for directed evolution experiments are also discussed along with recent strategies designed to by-pass them. Several emerging methods for creating novel enzymes are also discussed including examples of catalytic activity for which there is no precedent in nature. Finally, the combined use of several strategies is likely to be required in practice to improve multiple target properties of an enzyme, as successfully shown by a recent industrial example.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21684150     DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol        ISSN: 0959-440X            Impact factor:   6.809


  38 in total

Review 1.  Engineering the acyltransferase substrate specificity of assembly line polyketide synthases.

Authors:  Briana J Dunn; Chaitan Khosla
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Directed evolution combined with synthetic biology strategies expedite semi-rational engineering of genes and genomes.

Authors:  Zhen Kang; Junli Zhang; Peng Jin; Sen Yang
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.269

Review 3.  Tailoring Proteins to Re-Evolve Nature: A Short Review.

Authors:  Angelica Jimenez-Rosales; Miriam V Flores-Merino
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  Diminishing returns and tradeoffs constrain the laboratory optimization of an enzyme.

Authors:  Nobuhiko Tokuriki; Colin J Jackson; Livnat Afriat-Jurnou; Kirsten T Wyganowski; Renmei Tang; Dan S Tawfik
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Catalytic DNA with phosphatase activity.

Authors:  Jagadeeswaran Chandrasekar; Scott K Silverman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Use of nonionic surfactants for improvement of terpene production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  James Kirby; Minobu Nishimoto; Ruthie W N Chow; Venkata N Pasumarthi; Rossana Chan; Leanne Jade G Chan; Christopher J Petzold; Jay D Keasling
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Correlated positions in protein evolution and engineering.

Authors:  Jorick Franceus; Tom Verhaeghe; Tom Desmet
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Directed Evolution: Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Ryan E Cobb; Ran Chao; Huimin Zhao
Journal:  AIChE J       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.993

9.  Random mutagenesis by error-prone pol plasmid replication in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  David L Alexander; Joshua Lilly; Jaime Hernandez; Jillian Romsdahl; Christopher J Troll; Manel Camps
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014

Review 10.  Library methods for structural biology of challenging proteins and their complexes.

Authors:  Darren J Hart; Geoffrey S Waldo
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 6.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.