Literature DB >> 25055769

Random mutagenesis by error-prone pol plasmid replication in Escherichia coli.

David L Alexander1, Joshua Lilly, Jaime Hernandez, Jillian Romsdahl, Christopher J Troll, Manel Camps.   

Abstract

Directed evolution is an approach that mimics natural evolution in the laboratory with the goal of modifying existing enzymatic activities or of generating new ones. The identification of mutants with desired properties involves the generation of genetic diversity coupled with a functional selection or screen. Genetic diversity can be generated using PCR or using in vivo methods such as chemical mutagenesis or error-prone replication of the desired sequence in a mutator strain. In vivo mutagenesis methods facilitate iterative selection because they do not require cloning, but generally produce a low mutation density with mutations not restricted to specific genes or areas within a gene. For this reason, this approach is typically used to generate new biochemical properties when large numbers of mutants can be screened or selected. Here we describe protocols for an advanced in vivo mutagenesis method that is based on error-prone replication of a ColE1 plasmid bearing the gene of interest. Compared to other in vivo mutagenesis methods, this plasmid-targeted approach allows increased mutation loads and facilitates iterative selection approaches. We also describe the mutation spectrum for this mutagenesis methodology in detail, and, using cycle 3 GFP as a target for mutagenesis, we illustrate the phenotypic diversity that can be generated using our method. In sum, error-prone Pol I replication is a mutagenesis method that is ideally suited for the evolution of new biochemical activities when a functional selection is available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25055769      PMCID: PMC4112372          DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1053-3_3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  26 in total

1.  The conserved active site motif A of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I is highly mutable.

Authors:  A Shinkai; P H Patel; L A Loeb
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-03-12       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Biochemical characterization of mutant forms of DNA polymerase I from Escherichia coli. I. The polA12 mutation.

Authors:  D Uyemura; I R Lehman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1976-07-10       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Production of randomly mutated plasmid libraries using mutator strains.

Authors:  Annalee W Nguyen; Patrick S Daugherty
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2003

4.  Single-stranded DNA family shuffling.

Authors:  Osamu Kagami; Miho Kikuchi; Shigeaki Harayama
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 5.  Laboratory-directed protein evolution.

Authors:  Ling Yuan; Itzhak Kurek; James English; Robert Keenan
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  A statistical analysis of random mutagenesis methods used for directed protein evolution.

Authors:  Tuck Seng Wong; Danilo Roccatano; Martin Zacharias; Ulrich Schwaneberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  Perspective: Sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories.

Authors:  Daniel M Weinreich; Richard A Watson; Lin Chao
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 8.  The diversity challenge in directed protein evolution.

Authors:  Tuck Seng Wong; Daria Zhurina; Ulrich Schwaneberg
Journal:  Comb Chem High Throughput Screen       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.339

9.  The mutagenic footprint of low-fidelity Pol I ColE1 plasmid replication in E. coli reveals an extensive interplay between Pol I and Pol III.

Authors:  Christopher Troll; Jordan Yoder; David Alexander; Jaime Hernández; Yueling Loh; Manel Camps
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2013-11-02       Impact factor: 3.886

10.  Targeted gene evolution in Escherichia coli using a highly error-prone DNA polymerase I.

Authors:  Manel Camps; Jussi Naukkarinen; Ben P Johnson; Lawrence A Loeb
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  5 in total

1.  Efficient, continuous mutagenesis in human cells using a pseudo-random DNA editor.

Authors:  Haiqi Chen; Sophia Liu; Samuel Padula; Daniel Lesman; Kettner Griswold; Allen Lin; Tongtong Zhao; Jamie L Marshall; Fei Chen
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Fluorescence-Based Reporters for Detection of Mutagenesis in E. coli.

Authors:  Melissa Standley; Jennifer Allen; Layla Cervantes; Joshua Lilly; Manel Camps
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  Spiked Genes: A Method to Introduce Random Point Nucleotide Mutations Evenly throughout an Entire Gene Using a Complete Set of Spiked Oligonucleotides for the Assembly.

Authors:  Edson Cárcamo; Abigail Roldán-Salgado; Joel Osuna; Iván Bello-Sanmartin; Jorge A Yáñez; Gloria Saab-Rincón; Héctor Viadiu; Paul Gaytán
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2017-07-05

4.  CRISPR Gene Perturbations Provide Insights for Improving Bacterial Biofuel Tolerance.

Authors:  Peter B Otoupal; Anushree Chatterjee
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-09-04

Review 5.  Synthetic biology for the directed evolution of protein biocatalysts: navigating sequence space intelligently.

Authors:  Andrew Currin; Neil Swainston; Philip J Day; Douglas B Kell
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 54.564

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.