OBJECTIVE: To examine the longitudinal course of pediatric bipolar (BP)-I disorder in youth transitioning from childhood into adolescence. METHODS: We conducted a four year prospective follow-up study of 78 youth with BP-I disorder 6-17 years old at ascertainment followed up into adolescent years (13.4 ± 3.9 years). All subjects were comprehensively assessed with structured diagnostic interviews, neuropsychological testing, psychosocial, educational and treatment history assessments. BP disorder was considered persistent if subjects met full criteria for DSM-IV BP-I disorder at follow-up. RESULTS: Of 78 BP-I participating youth subjects, 57 (73.1%), continued to meet full diagnostic criteria for BP-I Disorder. Of those with a non-persistent course, only 6.4% (n = 5) were euthymic (i.e., syndromatic and symptomatic remission) at the 4-year follow-up and were not receiving pharmacotherapy for the disorder. The other non-persistent cases either continued to have subthreshold BP-I disorder (n = 5, 6.4%), met full (n = 3, 3.8%) or subthreshold (n = 1, 1.3%) criteria for major depression, or were euthymic but were treated for the disorder (n = 7, 9.0%). Full persistence was associated with higher rates of major depression and disruptive behavior disorders at the follow-up assessment and higher use of stimulant medicines at the baseline assessment. Non-Peristent BP-I was also characterized by high levels of dysfunction and morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: This four year follow-up shows that the majority of BP-I disorder youth continue to experience persistent disorder into their mid and late adolescent years and its persistence is associated with high levels of morbidity and disability. Persistence of subsyndromal forms of bipolar disorder was also associated with dysfunction and morbidity.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the longitudinal course of pediatric bipolar (BP)-I disorder in youth transitioning from childhood into adolescence. METHODS: We conducted a four year prospective follow-up study of 78 youth with BP-I disorder 6-17 years old at ascertainment followed up into adolescent years (13.4 ± 3.9 years). All subjects were comprehensively assessed with structured diagnostic interviews, neuropsychological testing, psychosocial, educational and treatment history assessments. BP disorder was considered persistent if subjects met full criteria for DSM-IV BP-I disorder at follow-up. RESULTS: Of 78 BP-I participating youth subjects, 57 (73.1%), continued to meet full diagnostic criteria for BP-I Disorder. Of those with a non-persistent course, only 6.4% (n = 5) were euthymic (i.e., syndromatic and symptomatic remission) at the 4-year follow-up and were not receiving pharmacotherapy for the disorder. The other non-persistent cases either continued to have subthreshold BP-I disorder (n = 5, 6.4%), met full (n = 3, 3.8%) or subthreshold (n = 1, 1.3%) criteria for major depression, or were euthymic but were treated for the disorder (n = 7, 9.0%). Full persistence was associated with higher rates of major depression and disruptive behavior disorders at the follow-up assessment and higher use of stimulant medicines at the baseline assessment. Non-Peristent BP-I was also characterized by high levels of dysfunction and morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: This four year follow-up shows that the majority of BP-I disorder youth continue to experience persistent disorder into their mid and late adolescent years and its persistence is associated with high levels of morbidity and disability. Persistence of subsyndromal forms of bipolar disorder was also associated with dysfunction and morbidity.
Authors: Mani N Pavuluri; David B Henry; Julie A Carbray; Gwendolyn Sampson; Michael W Naylor; Philip G Janicak Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Roy H Perlis; Jordan W Smoller; Manuel A R Ferreira; Andrew McQuillin; Nick Bass; Jacob Lawrence; Gary S Sachs; Vishwajit Nimgaonkar; Edward M Scolnick; Hugh Gurling; Pamela Sklar; Shaun Purcell Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2009-05-15 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Boris Birmaher; David Axelson; Benjamin Goldstein; Michael Strober; Mary Kay Gill; Jeffrey Hunt; Patricia Houck; Wonho Ha; Satish Iyengar; Eunice Kim; Shirley Yen; Heather Hower; Christianne Esposito-Smythers; Tina Goldstein; Neal Ryan; Martin Keller Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2009-05-15 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Vivian Kafantaris; Daniel J Coletti; Robert Dicker; Gina Padula; Richard R Pleak; Jose Maria J Alvir Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Robert M Post; Lori L Altshuler; Gabriele S Leverich; Willem A Nolen; Ralph Kupka; Heinz Grunze; Mark A Frye; Trisha Suppes; Susan L McElroy; Paul E Keck; Mike Rowe Journal: Prim Care Companion CNS Disord Date: 2014-12-18
Authors: S Yen; R Stout; H Hower; M A Killam; L M Weinstock; D R Topor; D P Dickstein; J I Hunt; M K Gill; T R Goldstein; B I Goldstein; N D Ryan; M Strober; R Sala; D A Axelson; B Birmaher; M B Keller Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 2015-10-17 Impact factor: 6.392
Authors: Shelley R Hart; Elizabeth A Kastelic; Holly C Wilcox; Mary Beth Beaudry; Rashelle J Musci; Kathryn M Heley; Anne E Ruble; Karen L Swartz Journal: School Ment Health Date: 2014-02-23
Authors: Xavier Estrada-Prat; Anna R Van Meter; Ester Camprodon-Rosanas; Santiago Batlle-Vila; Benjamin I Goldstein; Boris Birmaher Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2019-05-15 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: J Wozniak; T Wilens; M DiSalvo; A Farrell; R Wolenski; S V Faraone; J Biederman Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 6.392
Authors: Timothy E Wilens; Joseph Biederman; MaryKate Martelon; Courtney Zulauf; Jesse P Anderson; Nicholas W Carrellas; Amy Yule; Janet Wozniak; Ronna Fried; Stephen V Faraone Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Janet Wozniak; Joseph Biederman; Mary Kate Martelon; Mariely Hernandez; K Yvonne Woodworth; Stephen V Faraone Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 4.839