Literature DB >> 21683837

Esophageal stents for anastomotic leaks and perforations.

Jonathan D'Cunha1, Natasha M Rueth, Shawn S Groth, Michael A Maddaus, Rafael S Andrade.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leaks and perforations are very morbid and challenging problems. Esophageal stents are increasingly playing an integral role in the management of these patients. Our objective was to report our experience with esophageal stent placement for anastomotic leaks and perforations and to provide a treatment algorithm.
METHODS: We performed a review of patients with stent placement for esophagogastric anastomotic leaks or esophageal perforation from March 2005 to August 2009. A prospective database was used to collect data. Success was defined as endoscopic defect closure, negative esophagram, and resumption of oral intake. Failure was defined as no change in leak size or clinical signs of ongoing infection. We collected and analyzed patient demographics, diagnosis, clinical history, and poststent outcomes using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients underwent esophageal stent placement for anastomotic leaks (n = 22) and perforations (n = 15). The median time from original procedure to diagnosis of leak or perforation was 6 days (0-420 days). Nineteen patients (51%) had 21 associated procedures for source control. We placed 94 stents (mean = 2.7 stents/patient); 16 patients (43%) required more than 1 stenting procedure (mean = 1.8 procedures/patient). The median time to restoration of esophageal integrity was 33 days (7-120 days). There were 22 successes (59%); 2 failures were secondary to undrained abscess. Only 2 failures occurred in the last 15 patients (88% success). Strictures did not develop in any patients. Serious complications occurred in 3 patients (stent erosion, leak enlargement, fatal gastroaortic fistula).
CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal stents can potentially play an integral role in the management of anastomotic leaks and perforations. Success depends on appropriate procedures for source control and surgeon experience.
Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21683837     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.04.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  27 in total

Review 1.  Optimal approach to the management of intrathoracic esophageal leak following esophagectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lara Schaheen; Shanda H Blackmon; Katie S Nason
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Covered self-expanding stent treatment for anastomotic leakage: outcomes in esophagogastric and esophagojejunal anastomoses.

Authors:  Jens Hoeppner; Birte Kulemann; Garbriel Seifert; Goran Marjanovic; Andreas Fischer; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; Hans-Jürgen Richter-Schrag
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Removable and repositionable covered metal self-expandable stents for leaks after upper gastrointestinal surgery: experiences in a tertiary referral hospital.

Authors:  Bart J M Leenders; Arnold Stronkhorst; Frans J Smulders; Grard A Nieuwenhuijzen; Lennard P L Gilissen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The effects of ankaferd blood stopper on the recovery process in an experimental oesophageal perforation model.

Authors:  Necla Gürbüz Sarıkaş; Tanzer Korkmaz; Nurettin Kahramansoy; Ali Kılıçgün; Çetin Boran; Güledal Boztaş
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.021

5.  Novel esophageal stent for treatment of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Gang Wu; Meipan Yin; Yan Shi Zhao; Yi Fang; Gaofeng Zhao; Jia Zhao; Xinwei Han
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Endoscopic management of esophageal leaks.

Authors:  Gabie K B Ong; Richard K Freeman
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Minimally invasive endoscopic therapy for the management of Boerhaave's syndrome.

Authors:  B Dent; A Immanuel; S M Griffin
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Major perioperative morbidity does not affect long-term survival in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Brent T Xia; Ernest L Rosato; Karen A Chojnacki; Albert G Crawford; Benny Weksler; Adam C Berger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Current treatment and outcome of esophageal perforations in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of 75 studies.

Authors:  Fausto Biancari; Vito D'Andrea; Rosalba Paone; Carlo Di Marco; Grazia Savino; Vesa Koivukangas; Juha Saarnio; Ersilia Lucenteforte
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Endoscopic endoluminal vacuum therapy is superior to other regimens in managing anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: a comparative retrospective study.

Authors:  Bodo Schniewind; Clemens Schafmayer; Gesa Voehrs; Jan Egberts; Witigo von Schoenfels; Tobias Rose; Roland Kurdow; Alexander Arlt; Mark Ellrichmann; Christian Jürgensen; Stefan Schreiber; Thomas Becker; Jochen Hampe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.