Literature DB >> 25759779

The effects of ankaferd blood stopper on the recovery process in an experimental oesophageal perforation model.

Necla Gürbüz Sarıkaş1, Tanzer Korkmaz2, Nurettin Kahramansoy3, Ali Kılıçgün4, Çetin Boran5, Güledal Boztaş6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal perforation is a life-threatening pathology that is generally treated conservatively; however, surgical procedures are frequently performed. A topical haemostatic agent, Ankaferd Blood Stopper (ABS), also has beneficial wound-healing effects. AIMS: This study aimed to determine the effects of ABS following experimental oesophageal perforations. STUDY
DESIGN: Animal experiment.
METHODS: The experimental rats were classified into 6 groups (with 7 rats in each group). Pairs of groups (primary repair alone and primary repair + ABS) were terminated in the 1(st), 2(nd), and 3(rd) weeks following injury. The oesophageal perforations, which were 8-10 mm in length, were created using a nasogastric tube. The perforation sites were repaired with a 6-0 polyglactine thread in the primary repair groups. Additionally, ABS was sprayed over the perforation site in the treatment groups. Each oesophagus was evaluated histopathologically.
RESULTS: There were fewer microabscesses and areas of necrosis in the ABS groups compared with the primary repair groups. The histopathological evaluation revealed that the ABS groups had less inflammation and more re-epithelisation compared to the primary repair groups (p=0.002 and p=0.003, respectively). Fibrosis in the ABS groups was moderate in the 2(nd) week and mild in the 3(rd) week. Comparing the groups with respect to the time intervals, only the 1(st) week groups showed a significant difference in terms of re-epithelialisation (p=0.044).
CONCLUSION: Topical ABS application on the repaired experimental oesophageal perforation regions led to positive wound-healing effects compared with the rats that were administered the primary repair alone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankaferd Blood Stopper; experimental; oesophageal perforation

Year:  2015        PMID: 25759779      PMCID: PMC4342146          DOI: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2015.15459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Balkan Med J        ISSN: 2146-3123            Impact factor:   2.021


  20 in total

1.  Management of esophageal perforation.

Authors:  I Okten; A K Cangir; N Ozdemir; S Kavukçu; H Akay; S Yavuzer
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Pleiotropic cellular, hemostatic, and biological actions of Ankaferd hemostat.

Authors:  Berat Z Haznedaroglu; Yavuz Beyazit; Sharon L Walker; Ibrahim C Haznedaroglu
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 3.  Esophageal perforation: surgical, endoscopic and medical management strategies.

Authors:  Boris Sepesi; Daniel P Raymond; Jeffrey H Peters
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.287

4.  Haemostatic actions of the folkloric medicinal plant extract Ankaferd Blood Stopper.

Authors:  H Goker; I C Haznedaroglu; S Ercetin; S Kirazli; U Akman; Y Ozturk; H C Firat
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Antimicrobial activity of plant extract Ankaferd Blood Stopper.

Authors:  Nuriye Tasdelen Fisgin; Yeliz Tanriverdi Cayci; Ahmet Yilmaz Coban; Duzgun Ozatli; Esra Tanyel; Belma Durupinar; Necla Tulek
Journal:  Fitoterapia       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Beneficial effects of Ankaferd Blood Stopper on caustic esophageal injuries: an experimental model.

Authors:  E Akbal; S Köklü; G Karaca; H M Astarci; E Koçak; A Taş; Y Beyazit; G Topcu; I C Haznedaroğlu
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.429

7.  Evolving management strategies in esophageal perforation: surgeons using nonoperative techniques to improve outcomes.

Authors:  Madhan Kumar Kuppusamy; Michal Hubka; Chance D Felisky; Philip Carrott; Elizabeth M Kline; Richard P Koehler; Donald E Low
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Conservative approach to the mediastinitis in childhood secondary to esophageal perforation.

Authors:  Suzi Demirbag; Tugrul Tiryaki; Cuneyt Atabek; Ilhami Surer; Haluk Ozturk; Salih Cetinkursun
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.168

9.  Aggressive conservative treatment of esophageal perforations in children.

Authors:  L Martinez; S Rivas; F Hernández; L F Avila; L Lassaletta; J Murcia; P Olivares; A Queizán; A Fernandez; M López-Santamaría; J A Tovar
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Analysis of unsuccessful esophageal stent placements for esophageal perforation, fistula, or anastomotic leak.

Authors:  Richard K Freeman; Anthony J Ascioti; Theresa Giannini; Raja J Mahidhara
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.