Literature DB >> 21682405

Effects of stimulation configurations on place pitch discrimination in cochlear implants.

Bomjun J Kwon1, Trevor T Perry, Vauna L Olmstead.   

Abstract

The present study aimed to examine the effect of electrode configuration, specifically monopolar (MP) or bipolar (BP) stimulation, on place pitch discrimination in cochlear implants (CIs). Twelve subjects implanted with the Nucleus Freedom device were presented with various pairs of stimulation across the electrode array, with varying degrees of distance between stimulation sites, and asked to judge the higher of the two in pitch. Each pair was presented either in the same mode or in different modes of stimulation for the within-mode or across-mode condition, respectively, at least 20 times. The result of the within-mode condition revealed that subjects, on average, were able to discriminate pitches significantly better in MP than in BP, with the sensitivity index (d') for adjacent channels of 1.2 for MP and 0.8 for BP. The result of the across-mode condition revealed that while individual variability existed, there was a strong tendency for CI subjects to perceive a higher pitch in BP stimulation than in MP for a similar site of stimulation. In other words, an MP channel needed to be shifted in a basal direction by as much as two electrodes on average to elicit a pitch comparable to that of a BP channel.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21682405      PMCID: PMC3135145          DOI: 10.1121/1.3586786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  Loudness growth observed under partially tripolar stimulation: model and data from cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Anthony J Spahr; Gulam Emadi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Pitch of noise bands.

Authors:  A M Small; R G Daniloff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing.

Authors:  D A Nelson; D J Van Tasell; A C Schroder; S Soli; S Levine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents.

Authors:  A Kral; R Hartmann; D Mortazavi; R Klinke
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Quadrupolar stimulation for Cochlear prostheses: modeling and experimental data.

Authors:  C N Jolly; F A Spelman; B M Clopton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects.

Authors:  L M Collins; T A Zwolan; G H Wakefield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve.

Authors:  C van den Honert; P H Stypulkowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Place-pitch and speech perception measures with bipolar and monopolar electrical stimulation of the cochlea.

Authors:  E L von Wallenberg; R D Battmer; I Doden; D Gnadeberg; K Häutle; T Lenarz
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1995-09

9.  Binaural edge pitch.

Authors:  M A Klein; W M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pitch ranking, electrode discrimination, and physiological spread-of-excitation using Cochlear's dual-electrode mode.

Authors:  Jenny L Goehring; Donna L Neff; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Michelle L Hughes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.