Literature DB >> 21679782

Comparison and usefulness of cardiac magnetic resonance versus computed tomography in infants six months of age or younger with aortic arch anomalies without deep sedation or anesthesia.

Mark A Fogel1, Thomas W Pawlowski, Matthew A Harris, Kevin K Whitehead, Marc S Keller, Justine Wilson, Deanna Tipton, Christine Harris.   

Abstract

The present project investigated whether cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) of aortic arch anomalies can be performed successfully in infants <6 months of age without the use of cardiac anesthesia or deep sedation. We performed a retrospective review of infants ≤6 months old from 2005 to 2009 who underwent either CMR or computed tomography angiography to investigate aortic arch abnormalities. The CMR procedure used a "feed and swaddle" protocol without deep sedation or cardiac anesthesia. Of the 52 infants referred for CMR, 24 underwent the feed and swaddle protocol (aged 2.6 ± 1.4 months). One patient awoke during the study, and examination of the remaining 23 yielded a definitive diagnosis (success rate 96%). The scanning time was 6.2 ± 3.1 minutes, with the large airways evaluation accounting for 1/2 the time. Single-shot axial steady-state free precession, in which the definitive diagnosis was made, accounted for 0.59 ± 0.3 minutes. Fifteen infants were diagnosed with a vascular ring. Of the 8 infants who underwent surgery, the diagnostic accuracy was 100%. During the same period, 19 patients, who had undergone computed tomography angiography (aged 1.67 ± 1.20 months), were referred for aortic arch evaluation. Of these 19 patients, 6 (32%) underwent sedation or anesthesia. The imaging time was 0.08 ± 0.06 minutes, significantly different from the CMR times (p <0.01). However, the overall room times (31.3 ± 22.3 and 35.8 ± 3.86 minutes, respectively) were not different between the CMR and angiographic groups. The radiation dose was 1.41 ± 1.03 mSv. In conclusion, CMR evaluation of aortic arch anomalies in children <6 months old can be successfully completed quickly using a feed and swaddle approach with high diagnostic accuracy. This protocol avoids the risks of sedation, as well as the radiation associated with computed tomography angiography.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21679782     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  18 in total

Review 1.  Congenital anomalies of the aortic arch.

Authors:  Sarv Priya; Richard Thomas; Prashant Nagpal; Arun Sharma; Michael Steigner
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

2.  Cardiovascular CT angiography in neonates and children: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction with iterative image reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Francesco Tricarico; Anthony M Hlavacek; U Joseph Schoepf; Ullrich Ebersberger; John W Nance; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Young Jun Cho; J Reid Spears; Francesco Secchi; Giancarlo Savino; Riccardo Marano; Stefan O Schoenberg; Lorenzo Bonomo; Paul Apfaltrer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Cardiovascular MRI without sedation or general anesthesia using a feed-and-sleep technique in neonates and infants.

Authors:  Jonathan Windram; Lars Grosse-Wortmann; Masoud Shariat; Mary-Louise Greer; Mark W Crawford; Shi-Joon Yoo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-08-23

4.  Utility of feed-and-sleep cardiovascular magnetic resonance in young infants with complex cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Masoud Shariat; Luc Mertens; Mike Seed; Lars Grosse-Wortmann; Fraser Golding; Laura Mercer-Rosa; Matthew Harris; Kevin K Whitehead; Christine Li; Mark A Fogel; Shi-Joon Yoo
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Early postoperative remodelling following repair of tetralogy of Fallot utilising unsedated cardiac magnetic resonance: a pilot study.

Authors:  Michael P DiLorenzo; Elizabeth Goldmuntz; Susan C Nicolson; Mark A Fogel; Laura Mercer-Rosa
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 1.093

6.  The relation of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) and intracranial pressure (ICP) in pediatric neurosurgery practice - Part II: Influence of wakefulness, method of ICP measurement, intra-individual ONSD-ICP correlation and changes after therapy.

Authors:  Susanne R Kerscher; Daniel Schöni; Felix Neunhoeffer; Markus Wolff; Karin Haas-Lude; Andrea Bevot; Martin U Schuhmann
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Non-pharmacological strategies to obtain usable magnetic resonance images in non-sedated infants: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elisa R Torres; Tyler A Tumey; Douglas C Dean; Wondwosen Kassahun-Yimer; Eloise D Lopez-Lambert; Mary E Hitchcock
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 5.837

8.  Retrospective respiratory self-gating and removal of bulk motion in pulmonary UTE MRI of neonates and adults.

Authors:  Nara S Higano; Andrew D Hahn; Jean A Tkach; Xuefeng Cao; Laura L Walkup; Robert P Thomen; Stephanie L Merhar; Paul S Kingma; Sean B Fain; Jason C Woods
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Safety of cardiac magnetic resonance and contrast angiography for neonates and small infants: a 10-year single-institution experience.

Authors:  Sheela Rangamani; Joby Varghese; Ling Li; Lisa Harvey; James M Hammel; Scott E Fletcher; Kim F Duncan; David A Danford; Shelby Kutty
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-08-12

10.  Infant cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using oscillatory ventilation: safe and effective.

Authors:  Alicia H Chaves; Joseph R Cava; Pippa Simpson; George M Hoffman; Margaret M Samyn
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 1.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.