Literature DB >> 21679723

Trends in self-reported health care provider recommendations for colorectal cancer screening by race.

Shayna E Rich1, Fatmatta M Kuyateh, Diane M Dwyer, Carmela Groves, Eileen K Steinberger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a racial difference exists in self-reported recommendations for colorectal cancer screening from a health care provider, and whether this difference has changed over time.
METHOD: Secondary analysis of the 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2008 Maryland Cancer Surveys, cross-sectional population-based random-digit-dial surveys on cancer screening. Participants were 11,368 White and 2495 Black Maryland residents age ≥ 50 years.
RESULTS: For each race, recommendations for colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy increased over time (67%-83% for Whites, 57%-74% for Blacks; p<0.001 for both), but the race difference remained approximately 10% at each survey. Among respondents without a colonoscopy in the last 10 years (n=5081), recommendations for fecal occult blood test (FOBT) in the past year decreased over time for Whites (37%-24%, p<0.001) and for Blacks (36-28%, p=0.05), with no difference by race in any year. In multivariable analysis, the effect of race on the odds of reporting a provider recommendation did not vary significantly across time for either test (p=0.80 for colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy, p=0.24 for FOBT for effect modification by year).
CONCLUSION: Whites were more likely than Blacks to report ever receiving a provider recommendation for colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy. Although the proportion of patients receiving recommendations for colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy increased over time, the gap between races remained unchanged.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21679723      PMCID: PMC3705709          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  21 in total

1.  Revised colorectal screening guidelines: joint effort of the American Cancer Society, U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and American College of Radiology.

Authors:  Elizabeth G McFarland; Bernard Levin; David A Lieberman; Perry J Pickhardt; C Daniel Johnson; Seth N Glick; Durado Brooks; Robert A Smith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Accuracy of self-reported cancer-screening histories: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Garth H Rauscher; Timothy P Johnson; Young Ik Cho; Jennifer A Walk
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates.

Authors:  Brenda K Edwards; Elizabeth Ward; Betsy A Kohler; Christie Eheman; Ann G Zauber; Robert N Anderson; Ahmedin Jemal; Maria J Schymura; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Laura C Seeff; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; S Luuk Goede; Lynn A G Ries
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Durado Brooks; Debbie Saslow; Otis W Brawley
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Colorectal cancer screening of African Americans by internal medicine resident physicians can be improved with focused educational efforts.

Authors:  Mark Friedman; Marie L Borum
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  Improving colorectal cancer screening among the medically underserved: a pilot study within a federally qualified health center.

Authors:  Kishore Khankari; Mickey Eder; Chandra Y Osborn; Gregory Makoul; Marla Clayman; Silvia Skripkauskas; Linda Diamond-Shapiro; Dan Makundan; Michael S Wolf
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Barriers of and facilitators to physician recommendation of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Carmen E Guerra; J Sanford Schwartz; Katrina Armstrong; Jamin S Brown; Chanita Hughes Halbert; Judy A Shea
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States.

Authors:  Hind A Beydoun; May A Beydoun
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Increasing colorectal cancer screening among African Americans, linking risk perception to interventions targeting patients, communities and clinicians.

Authors:  Stephanie H Ward; Karen Lin; Brian Meyer; Sarah B Bass; Lalitha Parameswaran; Thomas F Gordon; Sheryl Burt Ruzek
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.739

View more
  4 in total

1.  Disparities in cancer screening in individuals with a family history of breast or colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ninez A Ponce; Jennifer Tsui; Sara J Knight; Aimee Afable-Munsuz; Uri Ladabaum; Robert A Hiatt; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Association between self-reported depression and screening colonoscopy participation.

Authors:  Audrey H Calderwood; Janine Bacic; Lewis E Kazis; Howard Cabral
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

3.  Examining potential colorectal cancer care disparities in the Veterans Affairs health care system.

Authors:  Leah L Zullig; William R Carpenter; Dawn Provenzale; Morris Weinberger; Bryce B Reeve; George L Jackson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Disparities in endoscopy use for colorectal cancer screening in the United States.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; Rena Yadlapati
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.199

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.