OBJECTIVE: The authors assessed the 2-year outcomes, costs, and financial sustainability of a medical care management intervention for community mental health settings. METHOD: A total of 407 psychiatric outpatients with serious mental illnesses were randomly assigned to usual care or to a medical care manager who provided care coordination and education. Two-year follow-up chart reviews and interviews assessed quality and outcomes of care, as well as costs from both the health system and managerial perspectives. RESULTS: Sustained improvements were observed in the intervention group in quality of primary care preventive services, quality of cardiometabolic care, and mental health-related quality of life. From a health system perspective, by year 2, the mean per-patient total costs for the intervention group were $932 (95% CI=-1,973 to 102) less than for the usual care group, with a 92.3% probability that the program was associated with lower costs than usual care. From the community mental health center perspective, the program would break even (i.e., revenues would cover setup costs) if 58% or more of clients had Medicaid or another form of insurance. Given that only 40.5% of clients in this study had Medicaid, the program was not sustainable after grant funding ended. CONCLUSIONS: The positive long-term outcomes and favorable cost profile provide evidence of the potential value of this model. However, the discrepancy between health system and managerial cost perspectives limited the program's financial sustainability. With anticipated insurance expansions under health reform, there is likely to be a stronger business case for safety net organizations considering implementing evidence-based interventions such as the one examined in this study.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The authors assessed the 2-year outcomes, costs, and financial sustainability of a medical care management intervention for community mental health settings. METHOD: A total of 407 psychiatric outpatients with serious mental illnesses were randomly assigned to usual care or to a medical care manager who provided care coordination and education. Two-year follow-up chart reviews and interviews assessed quality and outcomes of care, as well as costs from both the health system and managerial perspectives. RESULTS: Sustained improvements were observed in the intervention group in quality of primary care preventive services, quality of cardiometabolic care, and mental health-related quality of life. From a health system perspective, by year 2, the mean per-patient total costs for the intervention group were $932 (95% CI=-1,973 to 102) less than for the usual care group, with a 92.3% probability that the program was associated with lower costs than usual care. From the community mental health center perspective, the program would break even (i.e., revenues would cover setup costs) if 58% or more of clients had Medicaid or another form of insurance. Given that only 40.5% of clients in this study had Medicaid, the program was not sustainable after grant funding ended. CONCLUSIONS: The positive long-term outcomes and favorable cost profile provide evidence of the potential value of this model. However, the discrepancy between health system and managerial cost perspectives limited the program's financial sustainability. With anticipated insurance expansions under health reform, there is likely to be a stronger business case for safety net organizations considering implementing evidence-based interventions such as the one examined in this study.
Authors: Sheila Leatherman; Donald Berwick; Debra Iles; Lawrence S Lewin; Frank Davidoff; Thomas Nolan; Maureen Bisognano Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Enid M Hunkeler; Wayne Katon; Lingqi Tang; John W Williams; Kurt Kroenke; Elizabeth H B Lin; Linda H Harpole; Patricia Arean; Stuart Levine; Lydia M Grypma; William A Hargreaves; Jürgen Unützer Journal: BMJ Date: 2006-01-20
Authors: Margaret Handley; Kate MacGregor; Dean Schillinger; Claire Sharifi; Sharon Wong; Thomas Bodenheimer Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2006 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Benjamin G Druss; Silke A von Esenwein; Michael T Compton; Kimberly J Rask; Liping Zhao; Ruth M Parker Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Michael Schoenbaum; Kelly Kelleher; Judith R Lave; Stephanie Green; Donna Keyser; Harold Pincus Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: K John McConnell; Anna Marie Chang; Deborah J Cohen; Neal Wallace; Michael E Chernew; Glenn Kautz; Dennis McCarty; Bentson McFarland; Bill Wright; Jeanene Smith Journal: Healthc (Amst) Date: 2014-09
Authors: Christina Mangurian; Grace C Niu; Dean Schillinger; John W Newcomer; James Dilley; Margaret A Handley Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Caitlin Mc Fehily; Kate M Bartlem; John H Wiggers; Paula M Wye; Richard V Clancy; David J Castle; Andrew Wilson; Chris E Rissel; Sonia Wutzke; Rebecca K Hodder; Kim Colyvas; Fionna Murphy; Jenny A Bowman Journal: Aust N Z J Psychiatry Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 5.744