OBJECTIVE: Poor quality of healthcare contributes to impaired health and excess mortality in individuals with severe mental disorders. The authors tested a population-based medical care management intervention designed to improve primary medical care in community mental health settings. METHOD: A total of 407 subjects with severe mental illness at an urban community mental health center were randomly assigned to either the medical care management intervention or usual care. For individuals in the intervention group, care managers provided communication and advocacy with medical providers, health education, and support in overcoming system-level fragmentation and barriers to primary medical care. RESULTS: At a 12-month follow-up evaluation, the intervention group received an average of 58.7% of recommended preventive services compared with a rate of 21.8% in the usual care group. They also received a significantly higher proportion of evidence-based services for cardiometabolic conditions (34.9% versus 27.7%) and were more likely to have a primary care provider (71.2% versus 51.9%). The intervention group showed significant improvement on the SF-36 mental component summary (8.0% [versus a 1.1% decline in the usual care group]) and a nonsignificant improvement on the SF-36 physical component summary. Among subjects with available laboratory data, scores on the Framingham Cardiovascular Risk Index were significantly better in the intervention group (6.9%) than the usual care group (9.8%). CONCLUSIONS:Medical care management was associated with significant improvements in the quality and outcomes of primary care. These findings suggest that care management is a promising approach for improving medical care for patients treated in community mental health settings.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Poor quality of healthcare contributes to impaired health and excess mortality in individuals with severe mental disorders. The authors tested a population-based medical care management intervention designed to improve primary medical care in community mental health settings. METHOD: A total of 407 subjects with severe mental illness at an urban community mental health center were randomly assigned to either the medical care management intervention or usual care. For individuals in the intervention group, care managers provided communication and advocacy with medical providers, health education, and support in overcoming system-level fragmentation and barriers to primary medical care. RESULTS: At a 12-month follow-up evaluation, the intervention group received an average of 58.7% of recommended preventive services compared with a rate of 21.8% in the usual care group. They also received a significantly higher proportion of evidence-based services for cardiometabolic conditions (34.9% versus 27.7%) and were more likely to have a primary care provider (71.2% versus 51.9%). The intervention group showed significant improvement on the SF-36 mental component summary (8.0% [versus a 1.1% decline in the usual care group]) and a nonsignificant improvement on the SF-36 physical component summary. Among subjects with available laboratory data, scores on the Framingham Cardiovascular Risk Index were significantly better in the intervention group (6.9%) than the usual care group (9.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Medical care management was associated with significant improvements in the quality and outcomes of primary care. These findings suggest that care management is a promising approach for improving medical care for patients treated in community mental health settings.
Authors: Benjamin G Druss; Steven C Marcus; Jeannie Campbell; Brian Cuffel; James Harnett; Chuck Ingoglia; Barbara Mauer Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Cynthia M Boyd; Chad Boult; Efrat Shadmi; Bruce Leff; Rosemarie Brager; Linda Dunbar; Jennifer L Wolff; Stephen Wegener Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2007-10
Authors: Amy M Kilbourne; Edward P Post; Agnes Nossek; Larry Drill; Susan Cooley; Mark S Bauer Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Cynthia M Boyd; Efrat Shadmi; Leslie Jackson Conwell; Michael Griswold; Bruce Leff; Rosemarie Brager; Martha Sylvia; Chad Boult Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-02-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Marc De Hert; Dan Cohen; Julio Bobes; Marcelo Cetkovich-Bakmas; Stefan Leucht; David M Ndetei; John W Newcomer; Richard Uwakwe; Itsuo Asai; Hans-Jurgen Möller; Shiv Gautam; Johan Detraux; Christoph U Correll Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Emma E McGinty; Alene Kennedy-Hendricks; Sarah Linden; Seema Choksy; Elizabeth Stone; Gail L Daumit Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2017-12-16 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Christine Li; Boris Birmaher; Brian Rooks; Mary Kay Gill; Heather Hower; David A Axelson; Daniel P Dickstein; Tina R Goldstein; Fangzi Liao; Shirley Yen; Jeffrey Hunt; Satish Iyengar; Neal D Ryan; Michael A Strober; Martin B Keller; Benjamin I Goldstein Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Rachel M Talley; Stephanie A Rolin; Barbara N Trejo; Matthew L Goldman; Jean-Marie E Alves-Bradford; Lisa B Dixon Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Jennifer P Wisdom; R Eric Lewandowski; Michele Pollock; Mary Acri; Priscilla Shorter; S Serene Olin; Kelsey Armusewicz; Sarah Horwitz; Kimberly E Hoagwood Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2014-01