Literature DB >> 21676098

Intonational phrase structure processing at different stages of syntax acquisition: ERP studies in 2-, 3-, and 6-year-old children.

Claudia Männel1, Angela D Friederici.   

Abstract

This study explored the electrophysiology underlying intonational phrase processing at different stages of syntax acquisition. Developmental studies suggest that children's syntactic skills advance significantly between 2 and 3 years of age. Here, children of three age groups were tested on phrase-level prosodic processing before and after this developmental phase, while their brain activity was recorded. The Closure Positive Shift (CPS), which indexes the perception of intonational phrasing in adults, served as dependent variable. The event-related brain potentials of 3- and 6-year-olds, but not of 21-month-olds, showed a CPS. These results suggest that prosodic phrase processing, as indicated by the CPS, is established only later during children's development, pointing to a close interaction of prosody and syntax acquisition.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21676098     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01025.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  9 in total

Review 1.  What is Functional Communication? A Theoretical Framework for Real-World Communication Applied to Aphasia Rehabilitation.

Authors:  W J Doedens; L Meteyard
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 7.444

2.  Specific aspects of cognitive and language proficiency account for variability in neural indices of semantic and syntactic processing in children.

Authors:  Amanda Hampton Wray; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 6.464

Review 3.  The ontogeny of the cortical language network.

Authors:  Michael A Skeide; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Dutch and English toddlers' use of linguistic cues in predicting upcoming turn transitions.

Authors:  Imme Lammertink; Marisa Casillas; Titia Benders; Brechtje Post; Paula Fikkert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-24

5.  Brain response to prosodic boundary cues depends on boundary position.

Authors:  Julia Holzgrefe; Caroline Wellmann; Caterina Petrone; Hubert Truckenbrodt; Barbara Höhle; Isabell Wartenburger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-18

6.  Using event-related potentials to measure phrase boundary perception in English.

Authors:  Varghese Peter; Genevieve McArthur; Stephen Crain
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.288

7.  The use of intonation for turn anticipation in observed conversations without visual signals as source of information.

Authors:  Anne Keitel; Moritz M Daum
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-10

8.  Neurophysiological Correlates of Musical and Prosodic Phrasing: Shared Processing Mechanisms and Effects of Musical Expertise.

Authors:  Anastasia Glushko; Karsten Steinhauer; John DePriest; Stefan Koelsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Punctuation, Prosody, and Discourse: Afterthought Vs. Right Dislocation.

Authors:  Janina Kalbertodt; Beatrice Primus; Petra B Schumacher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.