Literature DB >> 35076868

What is Functional Communication? A Theoretical Framework for Real-World Communication Applied to Aphasia Rehabilitation.

W J Doedens1, L Meteyard2.   

Abstract

Aphasia is an impairment of language caused by acquired brain damage such as stroke or traumatic brain injury, that affects a person's ability to communicate effectively. The aim of rehabilitation in aphasia is to improve everyday communication, improving an individual's ability to function in their day-to-day life. For that reason, a thorough understanding of naturalistic communication and its underlying mechanisms is imperative. The field of aphasiology currently lacks an agreed, comprehensive, theoretically founded definition of communication. Instead, multiple disparate interpretations of functional communication are used. We argue that this makes it nearly impossible to validly and reliably assess a person's communicative performance, to target this behaviour through therapy, and to measure improvements post-therapy. In this article we propose a structured, theoretical approach to defining the concept of functional communication. We argue for a view of communication as "situated language use", borrowed from empirical psycholinguistic studies with non-brain damaged adults. This framework defines language use as: (1) interactive, (2) multimodal, and (3) contextual. Existing research on each component of the framework from non-brain damaged adults and people with aphasia is reviewed. The consequences of adopting this approach to assessment and therapy for aphasia rehabilitation are discussed. The aim of this article is to encourage a more systematic, comprehensive approach to the study and treatment of situated language use in aphasia.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aphasia; Common ground; Functional communication; Interactive; Language use; Multimodal

Year:  2022        PMID: 35076868     DOI: 10.1007/s11065-021-09531-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev        ISSN: 1040-7308            Impact factor:   7.444


  140 in total

1.  Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue.

Authors:  H P Branigan; M J Pickering; A A Cleland
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-05-15

2.  Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery.

Authors:  Sanjit K Bhogal; Robert Teasell; Mark Speechley
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production.

Authors:  Kathryn Bock; Gary S Dell; Franklin Chang; Kristine H Onishi
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-09-14

Review 4.  Using Visual Scene Displays as Communication Support Options for People with Chronic, Severe Aphasia: A Summary of AAC Research and Future Research Directions.

Authors:  David R Beukelman; Karen Hux; Aimee Dietz; Miechelle McKelvey; Kristy Weissling
Journal:  Augment Altern Commun       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  High scores on the Western Aphasia Battery correlate with good functional communication skills (as measured with the Communicative Effectiveness Index) in aphasic stroke patients.

Authors:  A M O Bakheit; S Carrington; S Griffiths; K Searle
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2005-03-18       Impact factor: 3.033

6.  Listeners as co-narrators.

Authors:  J B Bavelas; L Coates; T Johnson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-12

7.  Interaction-focussed therapy for aphasia: Effects on communication and quality of life.

Authors:  Scott Barnes; Lyndsey Nickels
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 2.484

8.  Aphasia rehabilitation: does generalisation from anomia therapy occur and is it predictable? A case series study.

Authors:  Wendy Best; Alison Greenwood; Jennie Grassly; Ruth Herbert; Julie Hickin; David Howard
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 9.  Using conversation analysis to assess and treat people with aphasia.

Authors:  Suzanne Beeke; Jane Maxim; Ray Wilkinson
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.761

10.  Deficits of semantic control produce absent or reverse frequency effects in comprehension: evidence from neuropsychology and dual task methodology.

Authors:  Azizah Almaghyuli; Hannah Thompson; Matthew A Lambon Ralph; Elizabeth Jefferies
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.