Literature DB >> 21672945

Current knowledge on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among women with sporadic breast cancer.

Abenaa M Brewster1, Patricia A Parker.   

Abstract

The use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in the U.S. among patients with unilateral invasive breast cancer increased by 150% from 1993 to 2003. Although CPM has been shown to reduce the risk for developing contralateral breast cancer, there is conflicting evidence on whether or not it reduces breast cancer mortality or overall death. The increase in the CPM rate is especially concerning among women with early-stage sporadic breast cancer who have a minimal annual risk for developing contralateral breast cancer, and for many of these women the risk for distant metastatic disease outweighs the risk for contralateral breast cancer. The lack of information about the clinical value of CPM in women with sporadic breast cancer is an important public health problem. This review evaluates current data on the clinical indications for CPM and long-term patient satisfaction and psychosocial outcomes. Gaps in knowledge about the clinical value of CPM, including patient- and physician-related psychosocial factors that influence the decision-making process of CPM among women with sporadic breast cancer, are highlighted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21672945      PMCID: PMC3228146          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  55 in total

1.  Contralateral breast carcinoma: an assessment of risk and prognosis in stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T1N1M0) patients with 20-year follow-up.

Authors:  P P Rosen; S Groshen; D W Kinne; S Hellman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Role of MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) versus conventional imaging for breast cancer presurgical staging in young women or with dense breast.

Authors:  N Biglia; V E Bounous; L Martincich; E Panuccio; V Liberale; L Ottino; R Ponzone; P Sismondi
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 4.424

4.  Inflammatory breast cancer: high risk of contralateral breast cancer compared to comparably staged non-inflammatory breast cancer.

Authors:  Catherine Schairer; Linda M Brown; Phuong L Mai
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Perception of screening and risk reduction surgeries in patients tested for a BRCA deleterious mutation.

Authors:  Jennifer K Litton; Shannon N Westin; Kaylene Ready; Charlotte C Sun; Susan K Peterson; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Diane C Bodurka; Karen H Lu; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Banu K Arun
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Cost-effectiveness of preventive strategies for women with a BRCA1 or a BRCA2 mutation.

Authors:  Kristin Anderson; Judith S Jacobson; Daniel F Heitjan; Joshua Graff Zivin; Dawn Hershman; Alfred I Neugut; Victor R Grann
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 7.  Arguments against routine contralateral mastectomy or undirected biopsy for invasive lobular breast cancer.

Authors:  J S Lee; C S Grant; J H Donohue; T B Crotty; W S Harmsen; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (PBSO) with or without prophylactic bilateral mastectomy (PBM) or no intervention in BRCA1 mutation carriers: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Jan Norum; Anne Irene Hagen; Lovise Maehle; Jaran Apold; John Burn; Pål Møller
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Diagnostic breast magnetic resonance imaging and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  Melony E S Sorbero; Andrew W Dick; Ellen Burke Beckjord; Gretchen Ahrendt
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Cancer screening adherence: does physician-patient communication matter?

Authors:  Sarah A Fox; John Heritage; Susan E Stockdale; Steven M Asch; Naihua Duan; Steven P Reise
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-02-27
View more
  21 in total

1.  Local Therapy Decision-Making and Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Young Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Karen Sepucha; Kathryn J Ruddy; Rulla M Tamimi; Shari Gelber; Meghan E Meyer; Lidia Schapira; Steven E Come; Virginia F Borges; Mehra Golshan; Eric P Winer; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy after unilateral breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Oluwadamilola Motunaryo Fayanju; Carolyn R T Stoll; Susan Fowler; Graham A Colditz; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Factors Affecting Surgical Decisions in Newly Diagnosed Young Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Mary L Greaney; Andrea F Patenaude; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.223

4.  Social and Clinical Determinants of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Reshma Jagsi; Monica Morrow; Nancy K Janz; Ann Hamilton; John J Graff; Steven J Katz
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Breast cancer: why do women opt for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy?

Authors:  Aron Goldhirsch; Shari Gelber
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Dose-dependent effect of mammographic breast density on the risk of contralateral breast cancer.

Authors:  Marzana Chowdhury; David Euhus; Maureen O'Donnell; Tracy Onega; Pankaj K Choudhary; Swati Biswas
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Michaela S Tracy; Meghan E Meyer; Karen Sepucha; Shari Gelber; Judi Hirshfield-Bartek; Susan Troyan; Monica Morrow; Lidia Schapira; Steven E Come; Eric P Winer; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Canada follows the US in the rise of bilateral mastectomies for unilateral breast cancer: a 23-year population cohort study.

Authors:  L Findlay-Shirras; I Lima; G Smith; M Clemons; A Arnaout
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Exploring reasons for overuse of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in Canada.

Authors:  J E Squires; S N Simard; S Asad; D Stacey; I D Graham; M Coughlin; M Clemons; J M Grimshaw; J Zhang; J M Caudrelier; A Arnaout
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Cost of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  Ashish A Deshmukh; Scott B Cantor; Melissa A Crosby; Wenli Dong; Yu Shen; Isabelle Bedrosian; Susan K Peterson; Patricia A Parker; Abenaa M Brewster
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.