Literature DB >> 21669629

The effects of a bumble bee nectar robber on plant reproductive success and pollinator behavior.

J E Maloof1.   

Abstract

Interactions between a plant species (Corydalis caseana), a bumble bee nectar robber (Bombus occidentalis), and a bumble bee pollinator (B. appositus) were studied. There were no significant differences between naturally robbed and unrobbed flowers in fruit set or mean seed set per fruit. Plots of C. caseana plants were subjected to treatments of robbing and no robbing using commercially available colonies of B. occidentalis. Robbers did not pollinate the flowers. Pollinator behavior was observed to determine (1) the number of bees attracted to each plot, (2) the number of inflorescences visited in a plot, (3) the number of flowers visited on each inflorescence, and (4) the distance flown between inflorescences. There were no significant differences in the number of inflorescences visited per bee or the number of flowers visited per inflorescence per bee when robbed and unrobbed treatments were compared. Of the parameters measured, only distance flown between inflorescences differed in the robbed and the unrobbed treatments. Bees flew significantly further between inflorescences in the robbed plots than in the unrobbed plots. The results indicate that the nectar robbers have no negative effect on fruit set or seed set in C. caseana and that they may cause increased pollen flow distances by changing the behavior of the pollinator.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 21669629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bot        ISSN: 0002-9122            Impact factor:   3.844


  11 in total

1.  Nectar replenishment maintains the neutral effects of nectar robbing on female reproductive success of Salvia przewalskii (Lamiaceae), a plant pollinated and robbed by bumble bees.

Authors:  Zhong-Ming Ye; Xiao-Fang Jin; Qing-Feng Wang; Chun-Feng Yang; David W Inouye
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Effects of nectar robbing on male and female reproductive success of a pollinator-dependent plant.

Authors:  Sandra V Rojas-Nossa; José María Sánchez; Luis Navarro
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Asymmetric competition for nectar between a large nectar thief and a small pollinator: an energetic point of view.

Authors:  Eliška Padyšáková; Jan Okrouhlík; Mark Brown; Michael Bartoš; Štěpán Janeček
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Differential effects of nectar robbing by the same bumble-bee species on three sympatric Corydalis species with varied mating systems.

Authors:  Yan-Wen Zhang; Qian Yu; Ji-Min Zhao; You-Hao Guo
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Increased host investment in extrafloral nectar (EFN) improves the efficiency of a mutualistic defensive service.

Authors:  Marcia González-Teuber; Juan Carlos Silva Bueno; Martin Heil; Wilhelm Boland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Impact of Striped-Squirrel Nectar-Robbing Behaviour on Gender Fitness in Alpinia roxburghii Sweet (Zingiberaceae).

Authors:  Xiaobao Deng; Dharmalingam Mohandass; Masatoshi Katabuchi; Alice C Hughes; David W Roubik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Does Plant Origin Influence the Fitness Impact of Flower Damage? A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Catalina González-Browne; Maureen M Murúa; Luis Navarro; Rodrigo Medel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Pollen-mediated gene flow from transgenic cotton under greenhouse conditions is dependent on different pollinators.

Authors:  Shuo Yan; Jialin Zhu; Weilong Zhu; Zhen Li; Anthony M Shelton; Junyu Luo; Jinjie Cui; Qingwen Zhang; Xiaoxia Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Nectar robbing positively influences the reproductive success of Tecomella undulata (Bignoniaceae).

Authors:  Vineet Kumar Singh; Chandan Barman; Rajesh Tandon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The evolution of mutualism with modifiers.

Authors:  Christopher G Quickfall; James A R Marshall
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.