Literature DB >> 21668107

The processing of invariant and variant face cues in the Garner Paradigm.

Fika Karnadewi1, Ottmar V Lipp.   

Abstract

Faces provide a complex source of information via invariant (e.g., race, sex and age) and variant (e.g., emotional expressions) cues. At present, it is not clear whether these different cues are processed separately or whether they interact. Using the Garner Paradigm, Experiment 1 confirmed that race, sex, and age cues affected the categorization of faces according to emotional expression whereas emotional expression had no effect on the categorization of faces by sex, age, or race. Experiment 2 used inverted faces and replicated this pattern of asymmetrical interference for race and age cues, but not for sex cues for which no interference on emotional expression categorization was observed. Experiment 3 confirmed this finding with a more stringently matched set of facial stimuli. Overall, this study shows that invariant cues interfere with the processing of emotional expressions. It indicates that the processing of invariant cues, but not of emotional expressions, is obligatory and that it precedes that of emotional expressions.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21668107     DOI: 10.1037/a0021333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  9 in total

1.  Decoding task and stimulus representations in face-responsive cortex.

Authors:  Dorit Kliemann; Nir Jacoby; Stefano Anzellotti; Rebecca R Saxe
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Smiling makes you look older.

Authors:  Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

3.  Older adults show less interference from task-irrelevant social categories: evidence from the garner paradigm.

Authors:  Pei Wang; Qin Zhang; Kai-Li Zhang
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-03-28

4.  The role of discriminability in face perception: Interference processing of expression, gender, and gaze.

Authors:  Enguang Chen; Bingbing Xia; Yujing Lian; Qi Zhang; Xuexian Yang; Hailing Wang
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.157

5.  Angry facial expressions bias gender categorization in children and adults: behavioral and computational evidence.

Authors:  Laurie Bayet; Olivier Pascalis; Paul C Quinn; Kang Lee; Édouard Gentaz; James W Tanaka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-26

6.  Interference among the Processing of Facial Emotion, Face Race, and Face Gender.

Authors:  Yongna Li; Chi-Shing Tse
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-28

7.  Not Only Top-Down: The Dual-Processing of Gender-Emotion Stereotypes.

Authors:  Wen-Long Zhu; Ping Fang; Hui-Lin Xing; Yan Ma; Mei-Lin Yao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-05-26

8.  Context Modulates Congruency Effects in Selective Attention to Social Cues.

Authors:  Andrea Ravagli; Francesco Marini; Barbara F M Marino; Paola Ricciardelli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-12

9.  Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Interactions between Facial Expressions and Gender Information in Face Perception.

Authors:  Chengwei Liu; Ying Liu; Zahida Iqbal; Wenhui Li; Bo Lv; Zhongqing Jiang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.