Literature DB >> 21666243

Pan-corneal endothelial viability assessment: application to endothelial grafts predissected by eye banks.

Aurélien Pipparelli1, Gilles Thuret, David Toubeau, Zhiguo He, Simone Piselli, Sabine Lefèvre, Philippe Gain, Marc Muraine.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present an experimental method for determining the viable cell pool of corneal endothelia and its application to assessing predissected endothelial grafts.
METHODS: The endothelial cell density (ECD) of five pairs of human organ cultured corneas was determined using a standard counting method with a calibrated image analysis system. A thin posterior graft (30-50 μm) was manually predissected from a cornea chosen at random. Predissected and control corneas were shipped to the remote center, where standard ECD determination was repeated and was immediately followed by a triple Hoechst/ethidium/calcein labeling coupled with image analysis of the whole graft surface. Numeration of nuclei (H+), dead cells (E+), and total area covered by viable cells (C+) allowed the calculation of viable ECD corresponding to the cell density that the cornea may have after redistribution of viable cells over the whole Descemet surface.
RESULTS: The median (range) viable ECD was lower than the standard ECD determined immediately earlier in predissected and control corneas: 1628 (1138-2379) and 2065 (1492-2876) cells/mm(2) (P = 0.043), corresponding to -20% (-1%-38%) and -12% (-3%-26%), respectively (P = 0.08).
CONCLUSIONS: Standard counting by eye banks overestimates the actual pool of viable endothelial cells. This may be the main explanation for the initially rapid decrease in ECD universally described in patients after all types of keratoplasty. Early low postoperative ECD may indicate that surgeons graft fewer living cells than the eye banks' ECD let suppose, rather than a massive pre- and postoperative cell death. The novel concept of viable ECD can be useful for assessing all types of corneal processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21666243     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  16 in total

1.  Vulnerability of corneal endothelial cells to mechanical trauma from indentation forces assessed using contact mechanics and fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Manuel A Ramirez-Garcia; Yousuf M Khalifa; Mark R Buckley
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  Cell viability and shock wave amplitudes in the endothelium of porcine cornea exposed to ultrashort laser pulses.

Authors:  Syed Asad Hussain; Carles Milián; Caroline Crotti; Laura Kowalczuk; Fatima Alahyane; Zacaria Essaïdi; Arnaud Couairon; Marie-Claire Schanne-Klein; Karsten Plamann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Utility of cell viability assays for use with ex vivo vocal fold epithelial tissue.

Authors:  Elizabeth Erickson-DiRenzo; M Preeti Sivasankar; Susan L Thibeault
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Analyzing live cellularity in the human trabecular meshwork.

Authors:  Jose M Gonzalez; Sarah Hamm-Alvarez; James C H Tan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  Eye-bank preparation of endothelial tissue.

Authors:  Grace E Boynton; Maria A Woodward
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.761

6.  ROCK inhibitor enhances adhesion and wound healing of human corneal endothelial cells.

Authors:  Aurélien Pipparelli; Yvan Arsenijevic; Gilles Thuret; Philippe Gain; Michael Nicolas; François Majo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparison of preservation and transportation protocols for preloaded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Vito Romano; Mohit Parekh; Alessandro Ruzza; Colin E Willoughby; Stefano Ferrari; Diego Ponzin; Stephen B Kaye; Hannah J Levis
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Eye bank prepared versus surgeon cut endothelial graft tissue for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: An observational study.

Authors:  Marie Regnier; Céline Auxenfans; Delphine Maucort-Boulch; Anne-Sophie Marty; Odile Damour; Carole Burillon; Viridiana Kocaba
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Global cell-by-cell evaluation of endothelial viability after two methods of graft preparation in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Maninder Bhogal; Maria S Balda; Karl Matter; Bruce D Allan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Real-time assessment of corneal endothelial cell damage following graft preparation and donor insertion for DMEK.

Authors:  Maninder Bhogal; Chan N Lwin; Xin-Yi Seah; Elavazhagan Murugan; Khadijah Adnan; Shu-Jun Lin; Gary Peh; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.