Literature DB >> 28101654

Cell viability and shock wave amplitudes in the endothelium of porcine cornea exposed to ultrashort laser pulses.

Syed Asad Hussain1, Carles Milián2, Caroline Crotti1, Laura Kowalczuk1, Fatima Alahyane1, Zacaria Essaïdi1, Arnaud Couairon2, Marie-Claire Schanne-Klein3, Karsten Plamann4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Some forms of keratoplasty assisted by ultrashort-pulse lasers require performing laser cuts close to the endothelium, which requires the knowledge of "safe" values concerning incision depth and pulse energy preserving endothelial cell viability. Our study aims to determine the thresholds for cell death in porcine corneas exposed to ultrashort laser pulses, in terms of laser pulse energy and nearness of the impacts to the endothelium.
METHODS: Using a laboratory laser set-up, lamellar cuts were induced while varying pulse energies and distances from the endothelium. A fluorescent staining protocol was used to determine the percentage of surviving endothelial cells. Numerical simulations of the Euler equations for compressible fluids provided pressure level and axial and radial pressure gradient estimates at the endothelium.
RESULTS: Ninety percent of the endothelial cells survived when using 16.5 μJ pulses no closer than 200 μm to the endothelium, or pulses not exceeding 2 μJ at a distance of 50 μm. The comparison of the observed percentage of surviving cells with the estimates of the shock wave amplitudes and gradients generated by the laser pulses yielded cell death thresholds at amplitudes in the megapascal range, or gradients of the order of 108 Pa/m.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide limits in terms of pulse energy and distance of the incision from the endothelium within which endothelial cell viability is preserved. Current forms of corneal laser surgery are compatible with these limits. However, these limits will need to be considered for the development of future laser routines working in close proximity to the endothelium.

Keywords:  Cell viability; Cornea; Endothelium; Keratoplasty; Laser surgery; Ultrashort pulse

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28101654     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-017-3583-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  18 in total

1.  Penetrating keratoplasty: indications over a 10 year period.

Authors:  N Al-Yousuf; I Mavrikakis; E Mavrikakis; S M Daya
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Self-focusing and spherical aberrations in corneal tissue during photodisruption by femtosecond laser.

Authors:  Valeria Nuzzo; Michèle Savoldelli; Jean-Marc Legeais; Karsten Plamann
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  In Vivo Confocal Microscopic Imaging of the Cornea After Femtosecond and Excimer Laser-assisted Penetrating Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Miklós D Resch; Elena Zemova; László Marsovszky; Nóra Szentmáry; Florian Bauer; Loay Daas; Max Pattmöller; Moatasem El-Husseiny; János Németh; Zoltán Z Nagy; Berthold Seitz
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  The parameters of the porcine eyeball.

Authors:  Irene Sanchez; Raul Martin; Fernando Ussa; Ivan Fernandez-Bueno
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Controlled cavitation-cell interaction: trans-membrane transport and viability studies.

Authors:  Rory Dijkink; Séverine Le Gac; Erwin Nijhuis; Albert van den Berg; István Vermes; André Poot; Claus-Dieter Ohl
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Biophysical response to pulsed laser microbeam-induced cell lysis and molecular delivery.

Authors:  Amy N Hellman; Kaustubh R Rau; Helen H Yoon; Vasan Venugopalan
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.207

Review 7.  Femtosecond lasers in ophthalmology.

Authors:  H Kaz Soong; João Baptista Malta
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Hydrodynamic determinants of cell necrosis and molecular delivery produced by pulsed laser microbeam irradiation of adherent cells.

Authors:  Jonathan L Compton; Amy N Hellman; Vasan Venugopalan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  CorneaJ: an imageJ Plugin for semi-automated measurement of corneal endothelial cell viability.

Authors:  Aurélien Bernard; Nelly Campolmi; Zhiguo He; Binh Minh Ha Thi; Simone Piselli; Fabien Forest; Jean-Marc Dumollard; Michel Peocʼh; Sophie Acquart; Philippe Gain; Gilles Thuret
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.651

10.  Microkeratome versus femtosecond laser predissection of corneal grafts for anterior and posterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  Olan Suwan-Apichon; Johann M G Reyes; Neil B Griffin; Jerry Barker; Patrick Gore; Roy S Chuck
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.651

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of Graphene and Carbon Nanotube Saturable Absorbers for Wavelength and Pulse Duration Tunability.

Authors:  Syed Asad Hussain
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Discovery of Several New Families of Saturable Absorbers for Ultrashort Pulsed Laser Systems.

Authors:  Syed Asad Hussain
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.