Syed Asad Hussain1, Carles Milián2, Caroline Crotti1, Laura Kowalczuk1, Fatima Alahyane1, Zacaria Essaïdi1, Arnaud Couairon2, Marie-Claire Schanne-Klein3, Karsten Plamann4. 1. LOA, ENSTA-ParisTech, École Polytechnique, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 828 bd des Maréchaux, F-91762, Palaiseau, France. 2. Centre de Physique Théorique, École Polytechnique, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91128, Palaiseau, France. 3. LOB, École polytechnique, CNRS, Inserm 1182, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91128, Palaiseau, France. 4. LOA, ENSTA-ParisTech, École Polytechnique, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 828 bd des Maréchaux, F-91762, Palaiseau, France. Karsten.Plamann@ensta-paristech.fr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Some forms of keratoplasty assisted by ultrashort-pulse lasers require performing laser cuts close to the endothelium, which requires the knowledge of "safe" values concerning incision depth and pulse energy preserving endothelial cell viability. Our study aims to determine the thresholds for cell death in porcine corneas exposed to ultrashort laser pulses, in terms of laser pulse energy and nearness of the impacts to the endothelium. METHODS: Using a laboratory laser set-up, lamellar cuts were induced while varying pulse energies and distances from the endothelium. A fluorescent staining protocol was used to determine the percentage of surviving endothelial cells. Numerical simulations of the Euler equations for compressible fluids provided pressure level and axial and radial pressure gradient estimates at the endothelium. RESULTS: Ninety percent of the endothelial cells survived when using 16.5 μJ pulses no closer than 200 μm to the endothelium, or pulses not exceeding 2 μJ at a distance of 50 μm. The comparison of the observed percentage of surviving cells with the estimates of the shock wave amplitudes and gradients generated by the laser pulses yielded cell death thresholds at amplitudes in the megapascal range, or gradients of the order of 108 Pa/m. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide limits in terms of pulse energy and distance of the incision from the endothelium within which endothelial cell viability is preserved. Current forms of corneal laser surgery are compatible with these limits. However, these limits will need to be considered for the development of future laser routines working in close proximity to the endothelium.
PURPOSE: Some forms of keratoplasty assisted by ultrashort-pulse lasers require performing laser cuts close to the endothelium, which requires the knowledge of "safe" values concerning incision depth and pulse energy preserving endothelial cell viability. Our study aims to determine the thresholds for cell death in porcine corneas exposed to ultrashort laser pulses, in terms of laser pulse energy and nearness of the impacts to the endothelium. METHODS: Using a laboratory laser set-up, lamellar cuts were induced while varying pulse energies and distances from the endothelium. A fluorescent staining protocol was used to determine the percentage of surviving endothelial cells. Numerical simulations of the Euler equations for compressible fluids provided pressure level and axial and radial pressure gradient estimates at the endothelium. RESULTS: Ninety percent of the endothelial cells survived when using 16.5 μJ pulses no closer than 200 μm to the endothelium, or pulses not exceeding 2 μJ at a distance of 50 μm. The comparison of the observed percentage of surviving cells with the estimates of the shock wave amplitudes and gradients generated by the laser pulses yielded cell death thresholds at amplitudes in the megapascal range, or gradients of the order of 108 Pa/m. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide limits in terms of pulse energy and distance of the incision from the endothelium within which endothelial cell viability is preserved. Current forms of corneal laser surgery are compatible with these limits. However, these limits will need to be considered for the development of future laser routines working in close proximity to the endothelium.
Authors: Miklós D Resch; Elena Zemova; László Marsovszky; Nóra Szentmáry; Florian Bauer; Loay Daas; Max Pattmöller; Moatasem El-Husseiny; János Németh; Zoltán Z Nagy; Berthold Seitz Journal: J Refract Surg Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Rory Dijkink; Séverine Le Gac; Erwin Nijhuis; Albert van den Berg; István Vermes; André Poot; Claus-Dieter Ohl Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2007-12-28 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Olan Suwan-Apichon; Johann M G Reyes; Neil B Griffin; Jerry Barker; Patrick Gore; Roy S Chuck Journal: Cornea Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 2.651