Literature DB >> 20571876

Genome structure affects the rate of autosyndesis and allosyndesis in AABC, BBAC and CCAB Brassica interspecific hybrids.

Annaliese S Mason1, Virginie Huteau, Frédérique Eber, Olivier Coriton, Guijun Yan, Matthew N Nelson, Wallace A Cowling, Anne-Marie Chèvre.   

Abstract

Gene introgression into allopolyploid crop species from diploid or polyploid ancestors can be accomplished through homologous or homoeologous chromosome pairing during meiosis. We produced trigenomic Brassica interspecific hybrids (genome complements AABC, BBAC and CCAB) from the amphidiploid species Brassica napus (AACC), Brassica juncea (AABB) and Brassica carinata (BBCC) in order to test whether the structure of each genome affects frequencies of homologous and homoeologous (both allosyndetic and autosyndetic) pairing during meiosis. AABC hybrids produced from three genotypes of B. napus were included to assess the genetic control of homoeologous pairing. Multi-colour fluorescent in situ hybridisation was used to quantify homologous pairing (e.g. A-genome bivalents in AABC), allosyndetic associations (e.g. B-C in AABC) and autosyndetic associations (e.g. B-B in AABC) at meiosis. A high percentage of homologous chromosomes formed pairs (97.5-99.3%), although many pairs were also involved in autosyndetic and allosyndetic associations. Allosyndesis was observed most frequently as A-C genome associations (mean 4.0 per cell) and less frequently as A-B genome associations (0.8 per cell) and B-C genome associations (0.3 per cell). Autosyndesis occurred most frequently in the haploid A genome (0.75 A-A per cell) and least frequently in the haploid B genome (0.13 B-B per cell). The frequency of C-C autosyndesis was greater in BBAC hybrids (0.75 per cell) than in any other hybrid. The frequency of A-B, A-C and B-C allosyndesis was affected by the genomic structure of the trigenomic hybrids. Frequency of allosyndesis was also influenced by the genotype of the B. napus paternal parent for the three AABC (B. juncea × B. napus) hybrid types. Homoeologous pairing between the Brassica A, B and C genomes in interspecific hybrids may be influenced by complex interactions between genome structure and allelic composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20571876     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-010-9140-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  27 in total

1.  Genomic plasticity and the diversity of polyploid plants.

Authors:  A R Leitch; I J Leitch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Meiotic chromosome pairing in Triticale.

Authors:  R Riley; T E Miller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-07-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Detection of chromosomal rearrangements derived from homologous recombination in four mapping populations of Brassica napus L.

Authors:  Joshua A Udall; Pablo A Quijada; Thomas C Osborn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Segmental structure of the Brassica napus genome based on comparative analysis with Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Isobel A P Parkin; Sigrun M Gulden; Andrew G Sharpe; Lewis Lukens; Martin Trick; Thomas C Osborn; Derek J Lydiate
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Integration of the cytogenetic and genetic linkage maps of Brassica oleracea.

Authors:  Elaine C Howell; Guy C Barker; Gareth H Jones; Michael J Kearsey; Graham J King; Erik P Kop; Carol D Ryder; Graham R Teakle; Joana G Vicente; Susan J Armstrong
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Broadening the Genetic Basis of Verticillium longisporum Resistance in Brassica napus by Interspecific Hybridization.

Authors:  W Rygulla; R J Snowdon; C Eynck; B Koopmann; A von Tiedemann; W Lühs; W Friedt
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.025

7.  Comparison of rapeseed cultivars and resynthesized lines based on allozyme and RFLP markers.

Authors:  H C Becker; G M Engqvist; B Karlsson
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Transfer of Brassica tournefartii (TT) genes to allotetraploid oilseed Brassica species (B. juncea AABB, B. napus AACC, B. carinata BBCC): homoeologous pairing is more pronounced in the three-genome hybrids (TACC, TBAA, TCAA, TCBB) as compared to allodiploids (TA, TB, TC).

Authors:  R Nagpal; S N Raina; Y S Sodhi; A Mukhopadhyay; N Arumugam; A K Pradhan; D Pental
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  PrBn, a major gene controlling homeologous pairing in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) haploids.

Authors:  Eric Jenczewski; Frédérique Eber; Agnès Grimaud; Sylvie Huet; Marie Odile Lucas; Hervé Monod; Anne Marie Chèvre
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Genetic regulation of meiotic cross-overs between related genomes in Brassica napus haploids and hybrids.

Authors:  Stéphane D Nicolas; Martine Leflon; Hervé Monod; Frédérique Eber; Olivier Coriton; Virginie Huteau; Anne-Marie Chèvre; Eric Jenczewski
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 11.277

View more
  29 in total

1.  Cytoplasmic and genomic effects on meiotic pairing in Brassica hybrids and allotetraploids from pair crosses of three cultivated diploids.

Authors:  Cheng Cui; Xianhong Ge; Mayank Gautam; Lei Kang; Zaiyun Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Homoeologous chromosome pairing between the A and B genomes of Musa spp. revealed by genomic in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Mouna Jeridi; Frédéric Bakry; Jacques Escoute; Emmanuel Fondi; Françoise Carreel; Ali Ferchichi; Angélique D'Hont; Marguerite Rodier-Goud
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  The first genetic map of a synthesized allohexaploid Brassica with A, B and C genomes based on simple sequence repeat markers.

Authors:  S Yang; S Chen; X X Geng; G Yan; Z Y Li; J L Meng; W A Cowling; W J Zhou
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Molecular cytogenetic identification of B genome chromosomes linked to blackleg disease resistance in Brassica napus × B. carinata interspecific hybrids.

Authors:  Rudolph Fredua-Agyeman; Olivier Coriton; Virginie Huteau; Isobel A P Parkin; Anne-Marie Chèvre; Habibur Rahman
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Molecular-cytogenetic characterization of C-genome chromosome substitution lines in Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss.

Authors:  Mehak Gupta; Annaliese S Mason; Jacqueline Batley; Sakshi Bharti; Shashi Banga; Surinder S Banga
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Genotypic effects on the frequency of homoeologous and homologous recombination in Brassica napus × B. carinata hybrids.

Authors:  Annaliese S Mason; Matthew N Nelson; Marie-Claire Castello; Guijun Yan; Wallace A Cowling
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Size and location of radish chromosome regions carrying the fertility restorer Rfk1 gene in spring turnip rape.

Authors:  Tarja Niemelä; Mervi Seppänen; Farah Badakshi; Veli-Matti Rokka; J S Pat Heslop-Harrison
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  The fate of chromosomes and alleles in an allohexaploid Brassica population.

Authors:  Annaliese S Mason; Matthew N Nelson; Junko Takahira; Wallace A Cowling; Gustavo Moreira Alves; Arkaprava Chaudhuri; Ning Chen; Mohana E Ragu; Jessica Dalton-Morgan; Olivier Coriton; Virginie Huteau; Frédérique Eber; Anne-Marie Chèvre; Jacqueline Batley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Cloning of TTG1 gene and PCR identification of genomes A, B and C in Brassica species.

Authors:  Mingli Yan; Xianjun Liu; Chunyun Guan; Lili Liu; Jianhua Xiang; Ying Lu; Zhongsong Liu
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  "Doubled-haploid" allohexaploid Brassica lines lose fertility and viability and accumulate genetic variation due to genomic instability.

Authors:  Margaret W Mwathi; Sarah V Schiessl; Jacqueline Batley; Annaliese S Mason
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 4.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.