BACKGROUND: The podocyte serves the important function of maintaining the glomerular filtration barrier, and many studies report a decrease in podocyte number relative to the development of proteinuric states. However, there is significant inconsistency in the number of podocytes counted, possibly due to different counting methods. We previously counted the three glomerular cell types in the mouse kidney and showed that the fractionator/disector method is a close approximation of the exhaustive count or the gold standard method. In this study, we compared the commonly used model-based approach with the design-based approach to count podocytes in the db/m and db/db mouse and illustrate that the design-based approach, which uses the fractionator/disector method, provides an accurate determination of podocyte number. METHODS: In the design-based approach, toluidine blue-stained 1-μm-thick sections from glutaraldehyde perfusion-fixed kidneys were used (n = 15) with the fractionator/disector method. In the model-based approach, WT-1-immunolabeled podocyte nuclei in 3- to 4-μm-thick formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of the same kidneys were counted with the Weibel-Gomez method. Glomerular volume was determined for each method. RESULTS: We discovered that the fractionator/disector method counted 89 ± 10 podocytes compared to the Weibel-Gomez method, which counted 137 ± 38 podocytes and overestimated podocyte number by 54% (p < 0.05). In addition, glomerular volume (231 ± 52 × 10(3) vs. 192 ± 64 × 10(3) μm(3)) was significantly underestimated by 17% (p < 0.0002). Moreover, the model-based approach was more time consuming. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the fractionator/disector method offers an unbiased and efficient determination of podocyte counts.
BACKGROUND: The podocyte serves the important function of maintaining the glomerular filtration barrier, and many studies report a decrease in podocyte number relative to the development of proteinuric states. However, there is significant inconsistency in the number of podocytes counted, possibly due to different counting methods. We previously counted the three glomerular cell types in the mouse kidney and showed that the fractionator/disector method is a close approximation of the exhaustive count or the gold standard method. In this study, we compared the commonly used model-based approach with the design-based approach to count podocytes in the db/m and db/db mouse and illustrate that the design-based approach, which uses the fractionator/disector method, provides an accurate determination of podocyte number. METHODS: In the design-based approach, toluidine blue-stained 1-μm-thick sections from glutaraldehyde perfusion-fixed kidneys were used (n = 15) with the fractionator/disector method. In the model-based approach, WT-1-immunolabeled podocyte nuclei in 3- to 4-μm-thick formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of the same kidneys were counted with the Weibel-Gomez method. Glomerular volume was determined for each method. RESULTS: We discovered that the fractionator/disector method counted 89 ± 10 podocytes compared to the Weibel-Gomez method, which counted 137 ± 38 podocytes and overestimated podocyte number by 54% (p < 0.05). In addition, glomerular volume (231 ± 52 × 10(3) vs. 192 ± 64 × 10(3) μm(3)) was significantly underestimated by 17% (p < 0.0002). Moreover, the model-based approach was more time consuming. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the fractionator/disector method offers an unbiased and efficient determination of podocyte counts.
Authors: Kathryn E White; Rudolf W Bilous; Sally M Marshall; Meguid El Nahas; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Giampiero Piras; Salvatore De Cosmo; GianCarlo Viberti Journal: Diabetes Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: V Ruotsalainen; P Ljungberg; J Wartiovaara; U Lenkkeri; M Kestilä; H Jalanko; C Holmberg; K Tryggvason Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1999-07-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: W Kriz; M Elger; M Nagata; M Kretzler; S Uiker; I Koeppen-Hageman; S Tenschert; K V Lemley Journal: Kidney Int Suppl Date: 1994-02 Impact factor: 10.545
Authors: Daniel Appel; David B Kershaw; Bart Smeets; Gang Yuan; Astrid Fuss; Björn Frye; Marlies Elger; Wilhelm Kriz; Jürgen Floege; Marcus J Moeller Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2008-12-17 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Madhusudan Venkatareddy; Su Wang; Yan Yang; Sanjeevkumar Patel; Larysa Wickman; Ryuzoh Nishizono; Mahboob Chowdhury; Jeffrey Hodgin; Paul A Wiggins; Roger C Wiggins Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Warangkana Pichaiwong; Kelly L Hudkins; Tomasz Wietecha; Tri Q Nguyen; Chiraporn Tachaudomdach; Wei Li; Bardia Askari; Takahisa Kobayashi; Kevin D O'Brien; Jeffrey W Pippin; Stuart J Shankland; Charles E Alpers Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Victor G Puelles; James W van der Wolde; Keith E Schulze; Kieran M Short; Milagros N Wong; Jonathan G Bensley; Luise A Cullen-McEwen; Georgina Caruana; Stacey N Hokke; Jinhua Li; Stephen D Firth; Ian S Harper; David J Nikolic-Paterson; John F Bertram Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-03-14 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Yan Li; Sungjin Chung; Zhilian Li; Jessica M Overstreet; Lyne Gagnon; Brigitte Grouix; Martin Leduc; Pierre Laurin; Ming-Zhi Zhang; Raymond C Harris Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2018-05-17
Authors: Katsuyuki Tanabe; Miguel A Lanaspa; Wataru Kitagawa; Christopher J Rivard; Makoto Miyazaki; Jelena Klawitter; George F Schreiner; Moin A Saleem; Peter W Mathieson; Hirofumi Makino; Richard J Johnson; Takahiko Nakagawa Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2012-02-15
Authors: Nicole K Andeen; Tri Q Nguyen; Floor Steegh; Kelly L Hudkins; Behzad Najafian; Charles E Alpers Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 10.612