Literature DB >> 21659349

Propensity score-based sensitivity analysis method for uncontrolled confounding.

Lingling Li1, Changyu Shen, Ann C Wu, Xiaochun Li.   

Abstract

The authors developed a sensitivity analysis method to address the issue of uncontrolled confounding in observational studies. In this method, the authors use a 1-dimensional function of the propensity score, which they refer to as the sensitivity function (SF), to quantify the hidden bias due to unmeasured confounders. The propensity score is defined as the conditional probability of being treated given the measured covariates. Then the authors construct SF-corrected inverse-probability-weighted estimators to draw inference on the causal treatment effect. This approach allows analysts to conduct a comprehensive sensitivity analysis in a straightforward manner by varying sensitivity assumptions on both the functional form and the coefficients in the 1-dimensional SF. Furthermore, 1-dimensional continuous functions can be well approximated by low-order polynomial structures (e.g., linear, quadratic). Therefore, even if the imposed SF is practically certain to be incorrect, one can still hope to obtain valuable information on treatment effects by conducting a comprehensive sensitivity analysis using polynomial SFs with varying orders and coefficients. The authors demonstrate the new method by implementing it in an asthma study which evaluates the effect of clinician prescription patterns regarding inhaled corticosteroids for children with persistent asthma on selected clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21659349      PMCID: PMC3202161          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  25 in total

1.  Sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounding assuming a marginal structural model for repeated measures.

Authors:  Babette A Brumback; Miguel A Hernán; Sebastien J P A Haneuse; James M Robins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Bounding causal effects under uncontrolled confounding using counterfactuals.

Authors:  Richard F MacLehose; Sol Kaufman; Jay S Kaufman; Charles Poole
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Results of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effect.

Authors:  Tobias Kurth; Alexander M Walker; Robert J Glynn; K Arnold Chan; J Michael Gaziano; Klaus Berger; James M Robins
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; James M Robins
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.

Authors:  Onyebuchi A Arah; Yasutaka Chiba; Sander Greenland
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Comment: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data.

Authors:  Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.901

7.  Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies.

Authors:  D Y Lin; B M Psaty; R A Kronmal
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Outcomes after periodic use of inhaled corticosteroids in children.

Authors:  Ann Chen Wu; Lingling Li; Irina Miroshnik; James Glauber; Charlene Gay; Tracy A Lieu
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.515

9.  Randomized comparison of strategies for reducing treatment in mild persistent asthma.

Authors:  Stephen P Peters; Nicholas Anthonisen; Mario Castro; Janet T Holbrook; Charles G Irvin; Lewis J Smith; Robert A Wise
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Evaluating medication effects outside of clinical trials: new-user designs.

Authors:  Wayne A Ray
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  10 in total

1.  The Army study to assess risk and resilience in servicemembers (Army STARRS).

Authors:  Robert J Ursano; Lisa J Colpe; Steven G Heeringa; Ronald C Kessler; Michael Schoenbaum; Murray B Stein
Journal:  Psychiatry       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.458

Review 2.  Design of the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS).

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Lisa J Colpe; Carol S Fullerton; Nancy Gebler; James A Naifeh; Matthew K Nock; Nancy A Sampson; Michael Schoenbaum; Alan M Zaslavsky; Murray B Stein; Robert J Ursano; Steven G Heeringa
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Can you party your way to better health? A propensity score analysis of block parties and health.

Authors:  Lorraine T Dean; Amy Hillier; Hang Chau-Glendinning; S V Subramanian; David R Williams; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  A comparison of confounding adjustment methods with an application to early life determinants of childhood obesity.

Authors:  L Li; K Kleinman; M W Gillman
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  The use of propensity scores and observational data to estimate randomized controlled trial generalizability bias.

Authors:  Taylor R Pressler; Eloise E Kaizar
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Use of Fibrates Monotherapy in People with Diabetes and High Cardiovascular Risk in Primary Care: A French Nationwide Cohort Study Based on National Administrative Databases.

Authors:  Ronan Roussel; Christophe Chaignot; Alain Weill; Florence Travert; Boris Hansel; Michel Marre; Philippe Ricordeau; François Alla; Hubert Allemand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Early intubation and patient-centered outcomes in septic shock.

Authors:  Jianmin Qu; Yanfei Shen; Huijuan Zhang
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 19.334

8.  Propensity Scores in Pharmacoepidemiology: Beyond the Horizon.

Authors:  John W Jackson; Ian Schmid; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2017-11-06

9.  Training in ERCP: a multifaceted enterprise now more than ever.

Authors:  James H Tabibian; Joseph W Leung
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-01-16

10.  Do preoperative depressive symptoms predict quality of life after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A longitudinal prospective study.

Authors:  Hao-Hsien Lee; Chong-Chi Chiu; King-Teh Lee; Jhi-Joung Wang; Jin-Jia Lin; Chien-Ming Chao; Hon-Yi Shi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.