Literature DB >> 18652982

Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.

Onyebuchi A Arah1, Yasutaka Chiba, Sander Greenland.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Uncontrolled confounders are an important source of bias in epidemiologic studies. The authors review and derive a set of parallel simple formulas for bias factors in the risk difference, risk ratio, and odds ratio from studies with an unmeasured polytomous confounder and a dichotomous exposure and outcome.
METHODS: The authors show how the bias formulas are related to and are sometimes simpler than earlier formulas. The article contains three examples, including a Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis of a preadjusted or conditional estimate.
RESULTS: All the bias expressions can be given parallel formulations as the difference or ratio of (i) the sum across confounder strata of each exposure-stratified confounder-outcome effect measure multiplied by the confounder prevalences among the exposed and (ii) the sum across confounder strata of the same effect measure multiplied by the confounder prevalences among the unexposed. The basic formulas can be applied to scenarios with a polytomous confounder, exposure, or outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: In addition to aiding design and analysis strategies for confounder control, the bias formulas provide a link between classical standardization decompositions of demography and classical bias formulas of epidemiology. They are also useful in constructing general programs for sensitivity analysis and more elaborate probabilistic risk analyses.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18652982     DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  34 in total

1.  Genetic self knowledge and the future of epidemiologic confounding.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; Tyler Vander Weele
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Associations between technical quality of diabetes care and patient experience.

Authors:  Onyebuchi A Arah; Bastiaan Roset; Diana M J Delnoij; Niek S Klazinga; Karien Stronks
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Confounding control in healthcare database research: challenges and potential approaches.

Authors:  M Alan Brookhart; Til Stürmer; Robert J Glynn; Jeremy Rassen; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Propensity score-based sensitivity analysis method for uncontrolled confounding.

Authors:  Lingling Li; Changyu Shen; Ann C Wu; Xiaochun Li
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Covariate selection in high-dimensional propensity score analyses of treatment effects in small samples.

Authors:  Jeremy A Rassen; Robert J Glynn; M Alan Brookhart; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  On the role of marginal confounder prevalence - implications for the high-dimensional propensity score algorithm.

Authors:  Tibor Schuster; Menglan Pang; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.890

7.  Associations of Polyethylenimine-Coated AN69ST Membrane in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy with the Intensive Care Outcomes: Observations from a Claims Database from Japan.

Authors:  Kent Doi; Masao Iwagami; Emiko Yoshida; Mark R Marshall
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.614

8.  Commentary: Tobacco smoking and asthma: multigenerational effects, epigenetics and multilevel causal mediation analysis.

Authors:  Onyebuchi A Arah
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  EVALUATING COSTS WITH UNMEASURED CONFOUNDING: A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR THE TREATMENT EFFECT.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Handorf; Justin E Bekelman; Daniel F Heitjan; Nandita Mitra
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.083

10.  Disparate rates of new-onset depression during the menopausal transition in 2 community-based populations: real, or really wrong?

Authors:  Bernard L Harlow; Richard F MacLehose; Derek J Smolenski; Claudio N Soares; Michael W Otto; Hadine Joffe; Lee S Cohen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.