Literature DB >> 19544175

Outcomes after periodic use of inhaled corticosteroids in children.

Ann Chen Wu1, Lingling Li, Irina Miroshnik, James Glauber, Charlene Gay, Tracy A Lieu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many children with persistent asthma use inhaled corticosteroids on a periodic basis. Clinical trials in adults suggest that periodic use of inhaled corticosteroids may be effective for patients with mild persistent asthma. However, scant information exists on the clinical outcomes of children with asthma who are using inhaled corticosteroids on a periodic basis in real-world settings.
OBJECTIVE: This prospective cohort study compared clinical outcomes during a 12-month follow-up period between children with persistent asthma whose parents believed that they were supposed to use inhaled steroids either (a) periodically or (b) daily year-round at the start of the period. The clinical outcomes studied were (1) asthma-related emergency department (ED) visits or hospitalizations, (2) uncontrolled asthma based on health care and medication use, and (3) outpatient visits for asthma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population included children with persistent asthma from two health plans whose parents reported that they were using inhaled corticosteroids during a baseline telephone interview. The interviews collected information on whether the children's parents believed they were supposed to use inhaled corticosteroids on a periodic or daily basis, as well as baseline asthma symptom status, sociodemographic, and behavioral variables. We used computerized databases to identify clinical events for each child during the 12 months after their baseline interview. Uncontrolled asthma was defined as any asthma-related ED visit or hospitalization, two or more oral steroid prescription fills, or four or more beta-agonists canisters filled during the 12-month period. We compared these outcomes between the periodic versus daily users of inhaled corticosteroids using logistic regression analyses. We conducted both (1) a traditional logistic regression analysis in which we adjusted for selection bias by including covariates such as age, asthma physical status, sociodemographic and behavioral variables, and history of asthma-related health care use during the year before interview and (2) an analysis using propensity scores to more fully adjust for selection bias.
RESULTS: Of a total of 476 children in the study, 55% of parents believed their children were supposed to be using inhaled corticosteroids on a periodic basis and 45% believed their children were supposed to be using them daily year-round based on the baseline parent interview. At baseline, periodic inhaled corticosteroid users had less severe asthma than daily users based on several measures including better asthma physical status scores on the Children's Health Survey for Asthma (mean 87 +/- 16.0 vs. 81 +/- 17.4, p = < 0.0001). During the year before the baseline interview, periodic users compared with daily users were less likely to have an ED visit or hospitalization (10% vs. 23%, p = 0.0001) and less likely to have had five or more albuterol prescription fills (13% vs. 31%, p < 0.0001). During the follow-up year, those who believed inhaled steroids were for periodic use were less likely than those who believed inhaled steroids were for daily use to have an ED visit or hospitalization for asthma (OR 0.36, 95% CI: 0.18-0.73), even after adjusting for baseline asthma status and other covariates. Similarly, those who believed inhaled steroids were for periodic use were less likely to have uncontrolled asthma, OR 0.38 (95% CI: 0.24-0.62). Analyses using propensity score adjustment yielded similar results to the logistic regression analyses.
CONCLUSION: Children whose parents believed they were supposed to use inhaled corticosteroids on a periodic basis had less severe asthma at baseline than those whose parents believed they were supposed to be using them daily. Periodic users were less likely than daily users to have adverse asthma outcomes during 1-year follow-up. This suggests that clinicians may be applying appropriate selection criteria by choosing patients with less severe asthma for periodic inhaled corticosteroid regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19544175      PMCID: PMC4004094          DOI: 10.1080/02770900802468517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Asthma        ISSN: 0277-0903            Impact factor:   2.515


  13 in total

1.  Daily versus as-needed corticosteroids for mild persistent asthma.

Authors:  Homer A Boushey; Christine A Sorkness; Tonya S King; Sean D Sullivan; John V Fahy; Stephen C Lazarus; Vernon M Chinchilli; Timothy J Craig; Emily A Dimango; Aaron Deykin; Joanne K Fagan; James E Fish; Jean G Ford; Monica Kraft; Robert F Lemanske; Frank T Leone; Richard J Martin; Elizabeth A Mauger; Gene R Pesola; Stephen P Peters; Nancy J Rollings; Stanley J Szefler; Michael E Wechsler; Elliot Israel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Daily inhaled corticosteroid treatment should not be prescribed for mild persistent asthma. Con.

Authors:  Homer A Boushey
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Adherence to asthma controller medication regimens.

Authors:  D A Stempel; S W Stoloff; J R Carranza Rosenzweig; R H Stanford; K L Ryskina; A P Legorreta
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 3.415

4.  Reliability and validity of the Children's Health Survey for Asthma.

Authors:  L Asmussen; L M Olson; E N Grant; J Fagan; K B Weiss
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Use of inhaled anti-inflammatory medication in children with asthma in managed care settings.

Authors:  R J Adams; A Fuhlbrigge; J A Finkelstein; P Lozano; J M Livingston; K B Weiss; S T Weiss
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2001-04

6.  Reasons for pediatrician nonadherence to asthma guidelines.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; O J Becher; H R Rubin
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2001-09

7.  Self-reported physician practices for children with asthma: are national guidelines followed?

Authors:  J A Finkelstein; P Lozano; R Shulruff; T S Inui; S B Soumerai; M Ng; K B Weiss
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR-3): Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma-Summary Report 2007.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 10.793

9.  Rescue use of beclomethasone and albuterol in a single inhaler for mild asthma.

Authors:  Alberto Papi; Giorgio W Canonica; Piero Maestrelli; Pierluigi Paggiaro; Dario Olivieri; Ernesto Pozzi; Nunzio Crimi; Antonio M Vignola; Paolo Morelli; Gabriele Nicolini; Leonardo M Fabbri
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Randomized comparison of strategies for reducing treatment in mild persistent asthma.

Authors:  Stephen P Peters; Nicholas Anthonisen; Mario Castro; Janet T Holbrook; Charles G Irvin; Lewis J Smith; Robert A Wise
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

1.  Propensity score-based sensitivity analysis method for uncontrolled confounding.

Authors:  Lingling Li; Changyu Shen; Ann C Wu; Xiaochun Li
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Antibiotic consumption in children prior to diagnosis of asthma.

Authors:  Fawziah Marra; Carlo A Marra; Kathryn Richardson; Larry D Lynd; Mark J Fitzgerald
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.317

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.