Literature DB >> 21655394

The role and position of passive intervertebral motion assessment within clinical reasoning and decision-making in manual physical therapy: a qualitative interview study.

Emiel van Trijffel1, Thomas Plochg, Frank van Hartingsveld, Cees Lucas, Rob A B Oostendorp.   

Abstract

Passive intervertebral motion (PIVM) assessment is a characterizing skill of manual physical therapists (MPTs) and is important for judgments about impairments in spinal joint function. It is unknown as to why and how MPTs use this mobility testing of spinal motion segments within their clinical reasoning and decision-making. This qualitative study aimed to explore and understand the role and position of PIVM assessment within the manual diagnostic process. Eight semistructured individual interviews with expert MPTs and three subsequent group interviews using manual physical therapy consultation platforms were conducted. Line-by-line coding was performed on the transcribed data, and final main themes were identified from subcategories. Three researchers were involved in the analysis process. Four themes emerged from the data: contextuality, consistency, impairment orientedness, and subjectivity. These themes were interrelated and linked to concepts of professionalism and clinical reasoning. MPTs used PIVM assessment within a multidimensional, biopsychosocial framework incorporating clinical data relating to mechanical dysfunction as well as to personal factors while applying various clinical reasoning strategies. Interpretation of PIVM assessment and subsequent decisions on manipulative treatment were strongly rooted within practitioners' practical knowledge. This study has identified the specific role and position of PIVM assessment as related to other clinical findings within clinical reasoning and decision-making in manual physical therapy in The Netherlands. We recommend future research in manual diagnostics to account for the multivariable character of physical examination of the spine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical reasoning; Diagnostic process; Manual physical therapy; Spinal disorders

Year:  2010        PMID: 21655394      PMCID: PMC3101068          DOI: 10.1179/106698110X12640740712815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Man Manip Ther        ISSN: 1066-9817


  38 in total

Review 1.  Inter-examiner reliability of passive assessment of intervertebral motion in the cervical and lumbar spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  E van Trijffel; Q Anderegg; P M M Bossuyt; C Lucas
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2005-07-01

2.  Manual physical assessment of spinal segmental motion: intent and validity.

Authors:  J Haxby Abbott; Timothy W Flynn; Julie M Fritz; Wayne A Hing; Duncan Reid; Julie M Whitman
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2007-11-07

3.  A history of manipulative therapy.

Authors:  Erland Pettman
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2007

Review 4.  Spinal motion palpation: a comparison of studies that assessed intersegmental end feel vs excursion.

Authors:  Michael T Haneline; Robert Cooperstein; Morgan Young; Kristopher Birkeland
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  Intertester reliability and diagnostic validity of the cervical flexion-rotation test.

Authors:  Toby M Hall; Kim W Robinson; Osamu Fujinawa; Kiyokazu Akasaka; Elizabeth A Pyne
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  Perceptions and use of passive intervertebral motion assessment of the spine: a survey among physiotherapists specializing in manual therapy.

Authors:  Emiel van Trijffel; Rob A B Oostendorp; Robert Lindeboom; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Cees Lucas
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2008-04-01

7.  Manual examination: is pain provocation a major cue for spinal dysfunction?

Authors:  G Jull; J Treleaven; G Versace
Journal:  Aust J Physiother       Date:  1994

8.  Therapists' conceptualization and characterization of the clinical concept of spinal stiffness.

Authors:  C G Maher; M Simmonds; R Adams
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1998-03

Review 9.  Reliability of spinal palpation for diagnosis of back and neck pain: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael A Seffinger; Wadie I Najm; Shiraz I Mishra; Alan Adams; Vivian M Dickerson; Linda S Murphy; Sibylle Reinsch
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Lumbar segmental instability: a criterion-related validity study of manual therapy assessment.

Authors:  J Haxby Abbott; Brendan McCane; Peter Herbison; Graeme Moginie; Cathy Chapple; Tracy Hogarty
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  4 in total

1.  Factors affecting confidence and knowledge in spinal palpation among International Manual Physical Therapists.

Authors:  Steve Karas; Anthony Schneiders; Duncan Reid; Victor Talisa
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-07

2.  Clinical decision-making in the management of cervical spine derangement: a case study survey using a patient vignette.

Authors:  Tracy Hahn; Christina Kelly; Erin Murphy; Paul Whissel; Michael Brown; Ron Schenk
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2014-11

3.  Manual physical therapists' use of biopsychosocial history taking in the management of patients with back or neck pain in clinical practice.

Authors:  Rob A B Oostendorp; Hans Elvers; Emilia Mikołajewska; Marjan Laekeman; Emiel van Trijffel; Han Samwel; William Duquet
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-04-05

4.  Indicating spinal joint mobilisations or manipulations in patients with neck or low-back pain: protocol of an inter-examiner reliability study among manual therapists.

Authors:  Emiel van Trijffel; Robert Lindeboom; Patrick Mm Bossuyt; Maarten A Schmitt; Cees Lucas; Bart W Koes; Rob Ab Oostendorp
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2014-06-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.