Literature DB >> 9520974

Therapists' conceptualization and characterization of the clinical concept of spinal stiffness.

C G Maher1, M Simmonds, R Adams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The clinical concept of spinal stiffness provides one basis for applying spinal manipulation. Because the terms used to describe the perceptual results of manual spinal stiffness testing are poorly defined, the nature and number of attributes contained in the concept remain unclear. This study attempted to clarify the concept of spinal stiffness by examining the relationships among 31 published spinal stiffness descriptors using cluster analysis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Each stiffness descriptor was printed on a magnetized rubber strip. Physical therapists in Houston (Tex) and Sydney (New South Wales, Australia) judged the similarity of the stiffness descriptors by arranging them on a board. The squared Euclidean distance between words was calculated, and cluster analysis was performed using Ward's method.
RESULTS: Cluster analysis reduced the 31 stiffness descriptors to three superclusters (limited mobility, increased mobility, and viscoelasticity) in both the Houston and Sydney data. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: In a step toward improving the reliability of spinal stiffness judgments, this study has identified the fundamental characteristics of the clinical concept of spinal stiffness. Research is now needed to clearly define these characteristics and then develop protocols that will allow physical therapists to reliably rate these attributes.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9520974     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/78.3.289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  6 in total

1.  The role and position of passive intervertebral motion assessment within clinical reasoning and decision-making in manual physical therapy: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Emiel van Trijffel; Thomas Plochg; Frank van Hartingsveld; Cees Lucas; Rob A B Oostendorp
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-06

2.  The assessment of function. Part II: clinical perspective of a javelin thrower with low back and groin pain.

Authors:  Michael P Reiman; Robert C Manske
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-05

3.  What characterizes people who have an unclear classification using a treatment-based classification algorithm for low back pain? A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tasha R Stanton; Mark J Hancock; Adri T Apeldoorn; Benedict M Wand; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2012-11-08

4.  Lumbar segmental instability: a criterion-related validity study of manual therapy assessment.

Authors:  J Haxby Abbott; Brendan McCane; Peter Herbison; Graeme Moginie; Cathy Chapple; Tracy Hogarty
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Predicting who responds to spinal manipulative therapy using a short-time frame methodology: Results from a 238-participant study.

Authors:  Maliheh Hadizadeh; Gregory Neil Kawchuk; Narasimha Prasad; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Distinguishing chronic low back pain in young adults with mild to moderate pain and disability using trunk compliance.

Authors:  Alexander Stamenkovic; Brian C Clark; Peter E Pidcoe; Susanne M van der Veen; Christopher R France; David W Russ; Patricia A Kinser; James S Thomas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.