Literature DB >> 17997344

Manual physical assessment of spinal segmental motion: intent and validity.

J Haxby Abbott1, Timothy W Flynn, Julie M Fritz, Wayne A Hing, Duncan Reid, Julie M Whitman.   

Abstract

Validity of a clinical test can be defined as the extent to which the test actually assesses what it is intended to assess. In order to investigate the validity of manual physical assessment of the spine, it is therefore essential to establish what physical therapists intend to assess when they are applying these tests. The aims of this study were to (1) establish what manual physical therapists are intending to assess while applying passive intervertebral motion tests; and (2) examine the face validity and content validity for manual physical assessment of the spine. We surveyed 1502 members of the national manual physical therapist organisations of New Zealand and the United States of America using a web-based survey instrument. Sixty-six percent of 466 respondents believed passive accessory intervertebral motion (PAIVM) tests were valid for assessing quantity of segmental motion, and 76% believed passive physiologic intervertebral motion (PPIVM) tests were valid for assessing quantity of segmental motion. Ninety-eight percent of manual physical therapists base treatment decisions at least in part on the results of segmental motion tests. Quality of resistance to passive segmental motion was considered of greater importance than quantity of kinematic motion during PAIVM tests, while the quality of complex kinematic motion was considered of greater importance than quantity of displacement kinematics during PPIVM tests. Manual physical therapists accept the face validity of manual physical assessment of spinal segmental motion to a great extent, however a minority voice scepticism. Content validity is dominated by concepts of segmental kinematics and the force-displacement relationship. Intent of assessment does, however, vary widely between therapists. These data will inform the design of concurrent validity studies. Further work is recommended to increase consistency of intent, methodology and terminology in manual physical assessment of the spine.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17997344     DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2007.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Man Ther        ISSN: 1356-689X


  25 in total

1.  Spinal manipulation after multiple fusions in an adult with scoliosis: a case report.

Authors:  Christina Cuka; Amy W McDevitt; Ann Porter-Hoke; Steve Karas
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2019-01-13

2.  Invited commentary.

Authors:  J Haxby Abbott
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

3.  The role and position of passive intervertebral motion assessment within clinical reasoning and decision-making in manual physical therapy: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Emiel van Trijffel; Thomas Plochg; Frank van Hartingsveld; Cees Lucas; Rob A B Oostendorp
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-06

4.  Accuracy of physical therapists' prognosis of low back pain from the clinical examination: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  J Haxby Abbott; Emma-Marie Kingan
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2014-08

5.  Beliefs and practice patterns in spinal manipulation and spinal motion palpation reported by canadian manipulative physiotherapists.

Authors:  Lisa C Carlesso; Joy C Macdermid; P Lina Santaguida; Lehana Thabane; Kevin Giulekas; Leo Larocque; James Millard; Caitlin Williams; Jack Miller; Bert M Chesworth
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

6.  Factors affecting confidence and knowledge in spinal palpation among International Manual Physical Therapists.

Authors:  Steve Karas; Anthony Schneiders; Duncan Reid; Victor Talisa
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-07

7.  Paraspinal Muscle Spindle Response to Intervertebral Fixation and Segmental Thrust Level During Spinal Manipulation in an Animal Model.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Letter to the editor: the evolution of manual therapy education: what are we waiting for?

Authors:  Adam Wielechowski; Kyle Feldman
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2020-06-16

9.  Reliability of joint mobility and pain assessment of the thoracic spine and rib cage in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Bryan Heiderscheit; William Boissonnault
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

10.  Criterion validity of manual assessment of spinal stiffness.

Authors:  Shane L Koppenhaver; Jeffrey J Hebert; Greg N Kawchuk; John D Childs; Deydre S Teyhen; Theodore Croy; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2014-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.