Literature DB >> 21655392

Symptom localization tests in the cervical spine: a descriptive study using imaging verification.

Jochen Schomacher1, Ken Learman.   

Abstract

The concept of isolation of a movement to a single specific spinal segment by blocking/stabilization is considered useful and important during both examination and treatment. This descriptive study endeavoured to determine whether a typical manual stabilizing procedure changes movement patterns in the cervical spine. Lateral radiographs were taken of five volunteers in active/assisted extension with and without manual fixation grasping with the thumb and fingers around the dorsal aspect of the neck at the level of the vertebral arch. Vertebral angular differences between the fixated and non-fixated movements were measured for intra-rater and inter-rater reliability using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and analyzed for differences using a student t-test. Intraclass correlation coefficient values for intra-rater reliability were fair to moderate whereas inter-rater reliability was excellent. Although not statistically significant, the results showed that in relation to the active extension, the vertebra above the fixated vertebrae moved slightly less (mean = -0.08°; SD = 2.55) as did the vertebrae two levels above fixation (mean = -0.11°; SD = 2.13). Movements of the vertebrae below the fixation and two levels below the fixation were also reduced (mean = -1.09°; SD = 2.07) and (mean = -0.65°; SD = 1.85) respectively. The results suggest the possibility of a three-point bending of the spinal column during fixation and symptom localization during fixation may be a product of soft tissue tension and/or pressure from the fixating fingers. Further research is necessary, including a design that allows consistency among all participants which is appropriately powered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spine; Pain specific segmental movement; Symptom localization tests

Year:  2010        PMID: 21655392      PMCID: PMC3101077          DOI: 10.1179/106698110X12640740712851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Man Manip Ther        ISSN: 1066-9817


  7 in total

1.  The role of spinal tissues in resisting posteroanterior forces applied to the lumbar spine.

Authors:  R Y Lee; J H Evans
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Management of cervical headache.

Authors:  G. Jull
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  1997-11

3.  Can interventional MRI provide an insight into the mechanics of a posterior-anterior mobilisation?

Authors:  A H McGregor; P Wragg; W M Gedroyc
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Dynamic response of the cervical spine to posteroanterior mobilisation.

Authors:  Raymond Y W Lee; Alison H McGregor; Anthony M J Bull; Paul Wragg
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Manual fixation versus locking during upper cervical segmental mobilization. Part 1: an in vitro three-dimensional arthrokinematic analysis of manual flexion-extension mobilization of the atlanto-occipital joint.

Authors:  E Cattrysse; J P Baeyens; J P Clarys; P Van Roy
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2006-10-30

6.  An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Vertigo in patients with cervical spine dysfunction.

Authors:  R Galm; M Rittmeister; E Schmitt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.