Literature DB >> 15621330

Dynamic response of the cervical spine to posteroanterior mobilisation.

Raymond Y W Lee1, Alison H McGregor, Anthony M J Bull, Paul Wragg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Posteroanterior mobilisation is a manual therapy technique that is commonly used in the examination and treatment of neck pain, but little is known about its biomechanical effect. The purpose of this study was to determine the intervertebral movements of the cervical spine produced by posteroanterior mobilisation.
METHODS: The cervical spines of nineteen healthy subjects were scanned using an open interventional magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Posteroanterior mobilisation forces were applied to the fifth cervical vertebra whilst they were in the prone position. Sagittal images of the spine were obtained before and during mobilisation.
FINDINGS: It was shown that posteroanterior mobilisation of the cervical spine generally produced extension of the upper motion segments and flexion of the lower segments. The middle segments were inconsistent in the direction of rotation. The cervical lordosis was found to increase with repeated PA loading cycles.
INTERPRETATION: The magnitude of intervertebral movement produced by mobilisation is small. Forces applied at one spinous process produced not only movements at the target vertebra but also movements of the entire cervical spine resulting in an increase in lordosis. Mobilisation should be interpreted as three-point bending of the entire cervical spine, rather than simple gliding of one vertebra upon another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15621330     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  8 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hugh Gemmell; Peter Miller
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2006-04-19

2.  Symptom localization tests in the cervical spine: a descriptive study using imaging verification.

Authors:  Jochen Schomacher; Ken Learman
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-06

3.  A simulated passive intervertebral motion task: observations of performance in a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Charles R Hazle; Arthur J Nitz
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-08

4.  Relative effectiveness and adverse effects of cervical manipulation, mobilisation and the activator instrument in patients with sub-acute non-specific neck pain: results from a stopped randomised trial.

Authors:  Hugh Gemmell; Peter Miller
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2010-07-09

5.  The audible pop from thoracic spine thrust manipulation and its relation to short-term outcomes in patients with neck pain.

Authors:  Joshua A Cleland; Timothy W Flynn; John D Childs; Sarah Eberhart
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2007

6.  Effects of central and unilateral posteroanterior mobilization on cervical lordosis, muscle stiffness and ROM in patient with ankylosing spondylitis: case study.

Authors:  Si-Eun Park; Bo-Kyung Kim; Sang-Bin Lee; Wan-Suk Choi; Dong-Moon Yeum
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-07-15

7.  Development of an Objective Portable Measurement Device for Spinal Joint Accessory Motion Testing.

Authors:  Hsiao-Kuan Wu; Hung-Jen Lai; Ting Teng; Chung-Huang Yu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  Devices Used to Measure Force-Time Characteristics of Spinal Manipulations and Mobilizations: A Mixed-Methods Scoping Review on Metrologic Properties and Factors Influencing Use.

Authors:  Marie-Andrée Mercier; Philippe Rousseau; Martha Funabashi; Martin Descarreaux; Isabelle Pagé
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-10-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.