Literature DB >> 11733133

Can interventional MRI provide an insight into the mechanics of a posterior-anterior mobilisation?

A H McGregor1, P Wragg, W M Gedroyc.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A pilot study aimed to investigate if interventional MRI could detect changes in the spine and surrounding soft tissues as a result of a posteroanterior mobilisation, and to determine if such an effect was specific to the level of application.
DESIGN: A prospective pilot study to investigate the kinematics of cervical spine mobilisation.
BACKGROUND: Posteroanterior mobilisation is a manual physiotherapy technique that is commonly used as an examination tool and a form of conservative treatment. The efficacy of this technique is controversial and little is known regarding the underlying mechanisms.
METHODS: Five control subjects were recruited and written informed consent obtained. Subjects were scanned, using a General Electric Signa SP10 Open Interventional MRI scanner, in the prone position with their necks in either a neutral or flexed position. In each position a posteroanterior mobilisation to the 2nd and 6th cervical vertebrae was performed. Sagittal images of the spine were obtained prior to, during and following the mobilisation.
RESULTS: Clear images of vertebral position could be obtained during the application of a posteroanterior mobilisation. Measurements of intervertebral angulation and translation demonstrated little if any motion during the application of a posteroanterior mobilisation, in both a flexed and neutral position. Changes were seen in terms of soft tissue compression and in some instances overall angulation of the cervical spine.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventional MRI can produce images of posteroanterior mobilisation. Dynamic imaging of the procedure produced images of unsuitable quality for analysis. The quasi-static images of suggested that the application of a posteroanterior mobilisation to the cervical spine produces minimal if any intervertebral motion, but significant soft tissue deformation of the overlying structures. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Posteroanterior mobilisation is frequently used in the assessment and management of spinal problems, but the efficacy of the technique remains controversial. This is hampered by the fact that little is known about the mechanisms involved during such a procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11733133     DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(01)00091-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  5 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hugh Gemmell; Peter Miller
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2006-04-19

2.  Clinical prediction rules: time to sacrifice the holy cow of specificity?

Authors:  Peter Huijbregts
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2007

3.  Symptom localization tests in the cervical spine: a descriptive study using imaging verification.

Authors:  Jochen Schomacher; Ken Learman
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-06

4.  Relative effectiveness and adverse effects of cervical manipulation, mobilisation and the activator instrument in patients with sub-acute non-specific neck pain: results from a stopped randomised trial.

Authors:  Hugh Gemmell; Peter Miller
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2010-07-09

5.  An objective spinal motion imaging assessment (OSMIA): reliability, accuracy and exposure data.

Authors:  Alan C Breen; Jennifer M Muggleton; Fiona E Mellor
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.