Literature DB >> 21645789

Nonclinical factors affecting women's access to trial of labor after cesarean delivery.

Lisa M Korst1, Kimberly D Gregory, Moshe Fridman, Jeffrey P Phelan.   

Abstract

The use of trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) has declined in the last decade, and the clinical risks of TOLAC remain low. Nonclinical factors continue to affect women's access to TOLAC. This article considers 5 categories of factors that seem to be influencing rates of TOLAC and vaginal birth after cesarean: opinion leaders and professional guidelines, hospital facilities and cesarean availability, reimbursement for providing TOLAC, medical liability, and patient-level factors. An evidence base and strategies to provide guidance to create a safe environment for vaginal birth after cesarean are needed. Obstetric information systems are critical to this effort.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21645789     DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2011.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Perinatol        ISSN: 0095-5108            Impact factor:   3.430


  11 in total

Review 1.  Women's Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators to Vaginal Birth After Cesarean in the United States: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Bridget Basile Ibrahim; Holly Powell Kennedy; Robin Whittemore
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 2.  Economic Evaluations Comparing a Trial of Labor with an Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anna Joy Rogers; Nathaniel G Rogers; Meredith L Kilgore; Akila Subramaniam; Lorie M Harper
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 5.725

3.  The Association between Hospital Frequency of Labor after Cesarean and Outcomes in California.

Authors:  Mekhala V Dissanayake; Marit L Bovbjerg; Ellen L Tilden; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2020-08-25

4.  Vaginal birth after cesarean: neonatal outcomes and United States birth setting.

Authors:  Ellen L Tilden; Melissa Cheyney; Jeanne-Marie Guise; Cathy Emeis; Jodi Lapidus; Frances M Biel; Jack Wiedrick; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  Strategies for reducing regional variation in the use of surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bradley N Reames; Sarah P Shubeck; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Hospital bans on trial of labor after cesarean and antepartum transfer of care.

Authors:  Melissa G Rosenstein; Laura Norrell; Anna Altshuler; William A Grobman; Anjali J Kaimal; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.081

7.  Maternal and perinatal outcome after previous caesarean section in rural Rwanda.

Authors:  Richard Kalisa; Stephen Rulisa; Jos van Roosmalen; Thomas van den Akker
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Health Care System Barriers to Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Mahboobeh Firoozi; Fatemeh Tara; Mohammad Robab Ahanchian; Robab Latifnejad Roudsari
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2020-04-18

9.  Validation of a predictive model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section.

Authors:  Javier Enrique Fonseca; Juliana Lucía Rodriguez; Durley Maya Salazar
Journal:  Colomb Med (Cali)       Date:  2019-03-30

10.  Demographic, Socioeconomic, Health Systems, and Geographic Factors Associated with Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: An Analysis of 2017 U.S. Birth Certificate Data.

Authors:  Bridget Basile Ibrahim; Holly Powell Kennedy; Margaret L Holland
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.